Average Extra of: Holly Willoughby TV address on This Morning about the Schofield Scandal 05/06/2023 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Holly Willoughby TV address on This Morning about the Schofield Scandal 05/06/2023 by AverageMansReviews

Well this just gets worse: I have seen this address just a couple of minutes ago, it was just garbage I mean I didn't expect her to drop Schofield in it; in the slightest but at minimum I did expect her to not make this situation worse, granted I'm old enough and wise enough to know anything she may have said would have probably made the situation worse anyway, but she could have been or This Morning could have been a little bit more selective on between them what they said. [I need to do is cover my back and say I am speculating on who came up with what was said here.]

In chronological order of points said roughly:

* Are you okay? I hope so. Well  Willoughby no, how can we be when we have been subjected to this con artist for many years and on top of that ITV/This Morning are trying to sweep it under the nearest carpet as quickly as possible and not taking the decisive action that is required.

* It's very strange to be sitting here without Phil. Well it shouldn't feel that strange considering the both of you struggled to work together only three weeks ago.

* I imagine you feel a lot like I have, shaken, troubled, let down worried about the well-being for people on all sides of what has been going on. Nope; no empathy here Willoughby, Schofield got caught yet it is unclear what people actually knew but what is clear some people knew something and turned a blind eye either to this highly inappropriate situation or/and this alleged toxic environment.

* Full of questions; you, me and all of us at This Morning gave our love and support to someone who was not telling the truth. How dare you Willoughby or/and This Morning attempt to emotionally manipulate us; implying a family atmosphere which I hope whomever came up with this stupid notion in turn makes us all culpable for allowing this to happen, you see like I have already said in other content I am very streetsmart, yes I may be dyslexic but my level of understanding of English is high so they really do hammer this emotional manipulation home. As I have said here Average Extra Special of: Schofield, Willoughby, Morning & ITV Link I would like this TV program to be cancelled, but it looks increasingly at this moment in time that; that is not going to happen so at minimum I find it annoying that not one of the hierarchy has come onto the TV show and addressed this situation properly by saying in a nutshell or something to the effect of; we deeply apologise and This Morning and ITV would like to say here and now regardless of what we knew or didn't know, we have clearly screwed up in how this situation developed and how we have dealt with it. We are now putting in place better stringent policies and rules to ensure that something like this never, ever happens again. So all we can do is once again deeply apologise and hopefully you will stand by us whilst we revamp the show to move on from this heinous situation with some old faces, new faces some old things, with some new things and finally it is times like this that we should now take time to give thanks to you the audience for spending many decades watching us, because without you we would have nothing. You see I have an average education, but even I know when to put your hands up and deal with an elephant in the room, I mean if they are going to continue the show they will have to revamp it to remove any element of Schofield and it would be foolish not to present the TV show in every way possible as fresh, but I digress.

*Who acted in a way, that they themselves felt they had to resign from ITV and stepped down from a career that they loved, that is a lot to process; ones again mental manipulation with the words felt and loved. It is an unacceptable to guilt your audience to feel empathy for somebody that was knowing and willing to deceive everybody and let's not forget he got caught, so if he didn't get caught no one would be any wiser.

The toll it is taking on their own mental health I mean I have already spoken about this in the previous content and the link I have already put in with this content. So I will highlight this again no, no, just no does Schofield or in this case  Willoughby/This Morning get to use this reference as a scapegoat [for those that haven't looked/read the Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2023/06/average-extra-special-of.html I will just remind you I have mental health myself and I have done for coming up to 15 years.] Schofield knew what he was doing was wrong hence why he has tried to change the narrative from controlling this situation to a victim of this situation including doubling down on the homophobic implication. Newsflash I don't care if he is gay, all I care about is; the innocent party or/and parties and the fact is he is a fraud and once again he got caught.

* I think what unites us all now is a desire to heal for the mental well-being of everyone. I hope as we start this new chapter and get back to a place of warmth and magic that this show holds for all of us, we can find strength in each other; wow more emotional manipulation of the highest order here. By pushing on about healing mental well-being, a new chapter everyone now wants to draw a line in the sand and move on, things don't work that way. There needs to be some kind of this time proper investigation into this entire situation, actually I am getting fed up with ITV or This Morning attempting to fob us off. But I digress. Warmth and magic, hold on we are not children here so don't speak to us like children, all of us once again do not make us feel that we are part of this absolute manure of this saga when, it has nothing to do with us the viewers, but I continue we can find the strength in each other. I mean come on, grow up and stop with the mental manipulation.

* From my heart, can I just say thank you for all of your kind messages and thank you for being here this morning; myself, Josie, Dermot, Alison, Craig and every single person that works on this show will continue to work hard every single day to bring you the show we love, so on that note Josie. More, more and more mental manipulation; for one I am not buying it I mean from the beginning Willoughby saying and taking a deep breath, to at some point almost crying to the end of this speech trying to move on and getting sympathy from Josie. With Josie at the end saying all we can do now is being the family we are. With Willoughby saying exactly, exactly. Wow this is completely the wrong attitude from Josie Gibson; I mean what the hell is wrong with this TV program and these people? Okay I get it they have to move on, but seriously you don't have to keep reinforcing the family garbage I mean it would have been better if somebody or anybody had came out and said okay all we can do is learn from this experience to make sure it never happens again [I know I have already made this reference in this content.] But to continue this family narrative including being flippantly trying to indicate enough is enough and now we move on. This entire attitude is gobsmacking

My general thoughts: to be brutally honest yet I think some of you may agree; after this performance I don't care where the script came from, Willoughby can go now with all this mental manipulation to evoke emotions makes me sick they can try as much they want to, they can't just sweep this under the carpet, because I am quite happy to go on the record by saying if they do this they are enabling this situation to occur and not only that they are enabling the future incidents of this nature to happen again and again. Like I said at the beginning  well this just gets worse; Willoughby and This Morning just look so bad for this  damage control situation attempt. I don’t be how they can continue this TV program now?  I mean how, by being completely ignoring this situation toxic topic from now on until  everyone else does the same which in itself I have to ask how deluded are these people? As far as I’m concerned everyone working on the programme is just on borrowed time, if ITV have any sense This Morning should be cancelled now or in the summer of 2024, so that they now have a timescale to work on filling the TV schedule.

 

 

Average Extra of: Schofield, Willoughby, Morning & ITV by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Schofield, Willoughby, Morning & ITV by AverageMansReviews

Warning: I will be covering some things that may be triggering or uncomfortable for some people.

I have to be honest: I find this all comical minus the innocent parties including Schofield's family and his ex-lover which out of respect for these innocent parties, I refuse to put in their names, yes you could easily go and look up these names but my point being is as this is my content I want to protect the innocent parties.

Schofield: this was 100% honestly true I wasn't going to actually put in my 2P worth on this situation, but then Schofield had to bring up one thing that completely changed my mind. He made reference to mental health and Caroline Flack and after that it wasn't going to be a case of if but when I did this content.

I don't care that Schofield is now getting support from other people now he is mentioned his mental health. I can say this with comfort and knowledge; the knowledge being I am very streetsmart and not forgetting the small ever so small detail I have mental health and I have suffered with it for coming up to 15 years, not trying to make people feel bad for me, but I know deep down I will suffer with it for the rest of my life. So with that background information on me and as I have already said I am very streetsmart; this is a tactic that Schofield used in my opinion is to garnish sympathy and not forgetting he has been lying to us for most of his life; when he decided to get married even knowing he was gay which just to cover my back I have no problem with, I just on this particular point have a problem with him getting married and forging this false life.

Personally; he doesn't get to use the get out of jail free card for mentioning his mental health and Flack, no seriously he doesn't get to use that card in the slightest based on this whole entire situation is solely of his doing and consequently he should deal with the consequences [if you want to save or rescue Schofield allow me to make a suggestion, but I will do it later in a different section.] But for now as far as I'm concerned Schofield is just one lower bracket below Mr Fixit, this is why I find it comical with these people defending Schofield, because we couldn't do anything towards Mr Fixit because he died before facing consequences for his despicable actions, but now we have Schofield that please remember I have just said they are not the same, but they can be loose similarities of behaviour and actions where this child had known Schofield for many years, even when he was of an older age this individual at minimum in a grey area of consent so by my moral compass that goes for 15, 16, 17 and 18 [I know 18 is fine but on an individual basis you don't know how 18-year-olds are going to react to a situation. Additional Update: Tuesday  12/07/2023; as everyone knows or should know, I like to be honest to the best of my ability, so over more present times it has come to light that this individual was indeed 18, whilst being in this situation. The reason why it has taken me so long to acknowledge this, is because I wanted to see the outcome of this investigation of ITV and This Morning, before commenting, but it has gone quiet on this side of things as things begin to heat up again for the BBC. I am not saying that Schofield is clear, but what I am saying is at worst there may be some shady behaviour throughout this ordeal at minimum, anything before this would be purely based on speculation, just to cover my back or unless there is new evidence that come to light in resolving this situation; back to original timeline.] So I do believe that Schofield was the one in control and before I get some form of backlash for this content I will keep this in mind; if it was a considerable relationship as Schofield keeps implying, why does he keep saying something to the effect of leave this individual out of it; it is me? I mean if it was indeed consensual he has nothing to worry about? In a nutshell I do believe that Schofield promised or gave false hope to this individual and when things went south in some fashion there were steps taken to take this individual off This Morning or/and then placed on Loose Women and possibly it has been alleged he took a payoff to leave quietly after that.

I mean I will highlight this again because I feel it is important; these people that are defending Schofield from taking this backlash, you should be defending the innocent parties in all of this. It was just one man that had the control over this entire situation and if Schofield thinks there is an element of homophobicness to this [just to cover my back I am not putting words in his mouth, he actually referenced this in an interview.] He is clutching at straws, because he would be so wrong. I will tell you what it has to do with. Schofield has lied for the majority of his life about mostly everything and the British public don't like to be made fools of and on top of that Schofield has made masses and masses of money, guess what I don't care if he is now broke, if it is true once again it comes from his mouth.

Willoughby: I mean agree with me or not but when this partnership began she was in her late 20s, so to begin with based on this she is relatively innocent. I am not defending her I'm just putting out a balanced perspective. Over more recent times I suspect and this is just speculation on my part without getting myself into too much trouble, at minimum she possibly had an inclination of what kind of person that Schofield was, now allow me to clarify I am not saying she knew and just saying at minimum this situation meaning their relationship was becoming untenable and people have noticed that their relationship had became strained on TV. We could say at the age of 42 she can stand on her own two feet where maybe in her younger years Schofield was the domineering one. But and I mean this respectfully I hope the people around her have kindly sat her down and said you know you're career is going to have to take a hit, because of what he knew or didn't know, you are going to be caught in the collateral damage. I do understand on Monday 05/06/2023 when she returns to This Morning she is going to give a statement or something like that. But I don't see her giving too much away or being allowed to give too much way from the perspective of what This Morning will allow her to say and I have just realised I'm not the only one that thinks like this as well.

Morning: I don't see how it is TV program could not know something was going on between Schofield and this individual, furthermore I don't know how this TV program can continue the now or future; this scandal is just too colossal for everything just to go back to apparently it's wholesome image when it is clearly not.

ITV: now does anyone remember when I said earlier "If you want to save or rescue Schofield allow me to make a suggestion, but I will do it later in a different section." Well we have come to that point; here is my suggestion if you really, truly wanted support or protect Schofield? This is what you do you campaign for ITV to cancel This Morning. Did anyone wonder why Schofield gave those two interviews late last week? Yes it may be a coincidence that the cynic in me knows if you want to deal with any bad news you release it later on in the week potentially Thursday or Friday so everyone has the weekend to talk about it and come Monday it is essentially old news so in theory this may have worked, but there is one problem the British public cannot forget about the Schofield saga and no it isn't solely down to the news, that in this case comes in second place, what comes in first place is the fact that from Monday to Friday we have this long-running daytime TV program This Morning on; which is a constant reminder of this saga.

So if you want Schofield to find a moment of peace cancel This Morning so that people can forget and Schofield can become a old news. But ITV are a joke if they don't cancel this TV program, but this is coming from the TV station that is still running Love Island after its traumatic history in fact the new season starts tomorrow, but for some reason cancelled The Jeremy Kyle Show in 2019 for its traumatic history. My point being is; all three of these programs should have been cancelled by now and not just one, but money and TV viewerships are the only things that matter isn't that right ITV?

 

 

Cocaine Bear 2023 by AverageMansReviews

Cocaine Bear 2023 by AverageMansReviews

Review Time

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/drugs/animal cruelty/shooting/stabbing/biting/animal feeding/clawing/decapitation/medical/vehicle crash/medical

In 1985, the Chattahoochee–Oconee National Forest, an American Black Bear [Bear performer: Allan Henry:] a female bear that has two cubs that ingests a lot of cocaine, at some point her cubs have some as well, which was dropped off from an aeroplane intended for a drug shipment, so anyone around this location for any reason better make sure if they go down to the woods today they don't come across this bear.

The framework and pacing of this 95 minutes film is straightforward, we do have this for obvious reasons 1980s feel and approach with these characters from time to time having flashbacks or mental image or just in case I have missed something; something from this ballpark, it moves smoothly but it isn't the most quickest 95 minutes film roughly I have ever seen.

Action/Comedy/Art: action it is obviously and mostly situated around this bear as for an example; it switches from one individual to another; here is a quick description of this sequence of events; we have these two individuals up two separate trees, so this bear starts with one, but then quickly realises the other has elements of cocaine on their person, so this bear quickly like greased lightning quickly; quickly races down one tree and quickly up the other to get high again, it is just so comical to see how this bear is able to quickly move on cocaine down and up these trees. The landscape, the gorography and the ending credit colourful splats are all good, without being too specific the gorography is imaginative and well presented.

Character developments and performances: on both counts they are reliably good versions of what they are meant to be and likewise set in the 1980s as well.

This film receives: 5/10, this film is mixed; now I feel like I have a bit of explaining to do, even though I have been consistently positive about this film, after taking everything into consideration, it just feels like this particular mark is the best suited for this film in its entirety. Now sadly this film had one of those in loving memory or something to that effect for Ray Liotta, as he died in 2022, his character in this film was Syd: the top guy to organise or pick up this drug shipment that has gone south. Somewhere in the two sections of ending credits there is one ending credits scene in each one and this film has some awards accredited to its name; 2 Nominees MTV Movie + TV Awards 2023; MTV Movie + TV Awards Best Villain The Bear from the same award ceremony/event Most Frightened Performance Jesse Tyler Ferguson.

 

The Little Mermaid 2023 by AverageMansReviews

The Little Mermaid 2023 by AverageMansReviews

Review Time

Warning/Disclaimer: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/animal cruelty/transformation/racism/colonialism/drowning/environmental/disintegrating/impaling/regeneration. Disclaimer anything I say about this film is based on the fact that it is already in this film for me to interpret, so basically if it wasn't in this film I wouldn't be discussing it, so consequently I could not be held responsible for it to a certain extent, yes I can choose my words carefully but that is as far as it goes, once again if it wasn't in this film, I wouldn't be discussing it in the first place. I should give you the courtesy warning I am going to tear this reimagining a new blowhole, based on the parameters which Disney themselves headset [I will discuss this more later on, when it becomes appropriate to do so.]

When will Disney learn their golden age should stay in their history books: basically; Arial [Halle Bailey:] is a mermaid which is very curious about the humans on land, she is also the youngest daughter of King Triton [Javier Bardem:] the King of Atlantica, he tries to squash Aerial's thirst to know more about the humans, he is prejudiced against the humans. But there is one person that Arial could and does go to; to fulfil our wish and that is her auntie; Ursula [Melissa McCarthy/alter ego Human Vanessa:] a devious Sea Witch octopus tentacle, that offers her niece Arial this once-in-a-lifetime opportunity with a short window, with a small price of her siren singing powers/voice. But if she fails to win over Prince Eric [Jonah Hauer-King:] is a human which has been adopted into this royal family, which is in desperate search to find the person that saved his life. With a kiss within 72 hours Arial belongs to her auntie.

The framework and pacing of this 135 minutes film is; smooth and it just settles down to its task, I mean it smoothly rotates from the storyline to musical numbers and then back again without interrupting the flow, let's be honest here; this is not problematic in the slightest.

It's just everything else that is very much a mixed bag; art/action under water; this is where predominantly the strengths of this film lay, be it the colourful and/or the scenery including the musical numbers, even with Arial and Flounder [Jacob Tremblay:] a tropical fish which is Arial's best friend which has anxiety, but when the chips are down he will be there, let's just hope he isn't laying next to the chips; as they are being chased by this shark and yes they really went to town on bringing these musical numbers to life with good singing/alternative sing as well.

But now we talk about the ugly side of this film; the reimagining of Ursula just no, her make-up looks terrible, in the big action sequences towards the end of this film it just looks bad, what the hell were they thinking? It looks like something from the early 2000's as it relates to the computer animation, it looks clunky and sticky.

Flounder: just no thank you, likewise what the hell were they thinking? The same can be said for Sebastian: [voiced by Daveed Diggs:] the right-hander crab to the King, his most trusted adviser and he is tasked with watching over Arial and finally we have  King Triton; this is just a thumbs down for me; I mean this character from the animated version from Disney; in our years has I would say with an estimation of being in his 50's white hair be it on his head or facial still looking strong, you know wise but still able to put finn to posterior, but this live-action looks about well into his 60's and has more in common with a human from the same age bracket with their prejudice views then a ruler over his kingdom.

Now we come on to the massive, uncomfortable reality of this live-action film; now as we can see in this reimagining of this film title; we can clearly see that Arial is of different ethnic background okay is everyone with me so far? So here is the excellent question; when the Prince opens his eyes vaguely enough to see the outline of Arial and for those that haven't seen this film yet, yes they were stupid enough to put a camera shot of his vision of what he could see, so the viewers/the audience can clearly see what he sees and even without my glasses on I can see that she was not Caucasian, yes they have a small defence that Vanessa is using the siren powers so I'll give them a small defence but that is about it, but then again they even squash their own defence by Prince Eric making reference to Sir Grimsby [Art Malik:] the Prime Minister of of this Kingdom, where I am paraphrasing Prince Eric has not got a clue why he is doing this. Where the siren song should be still working in theory? Because if it doesn't it just makes Prince Eric sound and look stupid or I don't know maybe give your characters a three-dimensional outlook, you know some kind of inner conflict of this spell is working, but something in Eric is telling him this is the wrong person.

So let me get this right Disney decide to go with this reimagining of having someone of a different ethnic background to portray Arial, then for Arial's powers to be used by her auntie/a.k.a. Vanessa which is Caucasian, do we not see a problem here? This clearly has been be a case of colonialism here of a lighter skin individual taking something from someone that isn't or at the very least racism.

If Vanessa was of the same or similar ethnic background and Ursula is still Caucasian, this would still be a problem. It's almost like Disney have no idea what they are doing with basically modernising their classics with cleansing appropriation; you either don't do it or you do it completely where you basically cover your posterior so that someone like me doesn't pick up on the clear issues , I mean forgive me but I have brain damage yet I can easily work out how to get around and modify this story without being so dumb as to run into this cultural situation, instead of Ursula being Vanessa, she gets her minions/her babies Flotsam and Jetsam [moray eels] to combined to be Vanessa, they already have Arial's voice/siren powers so there you go no problem or better yet problem solved  and on top of that we have these servants and other personal being under this adopted Prince which is also Caucasian which he also goes on trips purchasing these other a bits which can also be seen as colonialism. Which I have to be honest I found all of this to be the best comedy in this film by some distance, because there is much of it and just to cover my back the only reason I found it funny was, Disney and their feeble attempt to cleanse one of their classics as in my opinion spectacularly failed.

Character developments, performances and voice performances: the character developments are meant to be what they are meant to be for this title, yes as I made reference to earlier yes they can sing for those that have musical numbers. But generally speaking there are variable levels of success ranging from poor, to reliably good to deserves to be highlighted for throughout this shambles they are still able to shine. Sebastian voiced by Daveed Diggs and  Scuttle: a northern gannet which she is a quick mouth individual, which is a good friend to Arial if Scuttle is slightly wrong about the human's and their inventions and other things voiced by Awkwafina and also between these two characters/voice performances they perform this alternative musical number as well.

This film receives: 4/10, this film is mixed; I mean this reimagining was going to get a positive mark, but after a certain point in this film it just begins to take on water and slowly sinks. I mean I could overlook Prince Eric and the colonialism and him being Caucasian, but with full disclosure as soon as we see Vanessa, even though I have partially gave it a weak defence, still gave me no other option but to point out everything. When this content was first made this project has 1 accredited award to its name; 1 Winner The Queerties 2023; The Queerty Next Big Thing.

WCW Monday Nitro Season 1, Episode 8: Insurance Policy 23/10/1995 by AverageMansReviews

WCW Monday Nitro Season 1, Episode 8: Insurance Policy 23/10/1995 by AverageMansReviews

Warning/Disclaimer: flashing effects/colourful effects/fire. Disclaimer anything I say about this individual is purely based on wrestling and nothing else

Commentary Award goes to: all of the commentary team working individually or together; paraphrasing Bobby "The Brain" Heenan/"Weasel" doing his usual masterful work at being on commentary Eric Bischoff; making reference to the fact that the challenger and champion are both here tonight without any restrictions, Bischoff and Steve "Mongo" McMichael [Pepe the Chihuahua;] advertising the WCW Hotline and making reference to the WWF/E In Your House pay-per-view.

Wrestling Award goes to: I will be a bit more general, not out of laziness but just based on I would be discussing the whole wrestling matches on its programming tonight; so to start we have; " Macho Man" Randy Savage vs. Kurasawa [with Col. Parker:] Singles Match; basically this is how you keep both wrestlers looking strong with also getting a result, "The Canadian Crippler" Chris Benoit & "The Iceman" Dean Malenko vs. Mr. J. L. & Eddie Guerrero [with Alex Wright "Das Wunderkind" it was apparently meant to be Guerrero & Wright, but as you will clearly injured:] Tag Team match; and its surrounding content. Yes this match is everything you expect it to be and Harlem Heat: Stevie Ray & Booker T. [with Sister Sherry] vs. the WCW Heavyweight Champion Sting & "The Total Package" Lex Luther: Tag Team Match; and it surrounding content; this is one of the main event where it sets things up for Sunday and Halloween Havoc 1995.

Promo Award goes to: likewise I will be general based on the same reasons as the wrestling with; we have a Dungeon of Doom segment involving The Master, The Yeti [dormant in an iceberg,] "Mean"Gene Okerlund interviews  The Dungeon Of Doom's The Giant [with The Taskmaster Kevin Sullivan] and after the WCW World Heavyweight Champion Hulk Hogan [with "The Mouth of the South" Jimmy Hart;] both segments revolve around this upcoming Sunday pay-per-view WCW Halloween Havoc including Hogan laying down the challenge to the WCW United States Heavyweights Champion Sting or Savage or "The Total Package" Lex Luther; to take on Hogan for his championship.

Debut Award goes to: The Yeti; I have very a niche reason why I have awarded this award. If you have ever seen the animated TV movie of Inhumanoids 1986; specifically when Decompose begins to break free out of this iceberg, that essentially what we have here.

This episode receives:  10/10, this episode is lots of fun; it sets things up nicely for this Sunday's pay-per-view WCW Halloween Havoc 1995; which if you have forgotten I did say I would move on to the next.

 

Reactionary To The Wrestling News of: AEW: Collision is the second coming of CM Punk 31/05/2023 by AverageMansReview

Reactionary To The Wrestling News of: AEW: Collision is the second coming of CM Punk 31/05/2023 by AverageMansReview

On this day: more specifically Wednesday "You know what that means" AEW: Dynamite Tony Kahn announced: on the premiere of AEW: Collision Saturday 17/06/2023 way will see the return of CM Punk.

I only see trouble ahead: to be brutally honest I just thought I would create this content for now and for future use as well. Meaning even before anything kicks off again and trust me it isn't a case of if, but more like when Mr Punk kicks off again I can make reference to this content time after time. I have made reference to it already on social media that he isn't going to change, as he is in his 40s now, he is extremely unlikely to change and be more willing to nicely play with others or improve his professionalism.

If you have followed me long enough; you would know I have pretty much little time for Mr Punk anyway, but even when this situation hasn't at last year's All Out as it relates to this individual basically vs. The Elite and others including Ace Steal on the side of Mr Punk [on a quick side note; Why has Steel been brought back to the company?] But even I was relatively neutral but at one point on the side of Punk. But that didn't last for too long, on basically The Elite side of things they have seen with learned from the experience, being a little bit humble and moved on, with the idea not to repeat this situation ever again. I mean don't get me wrong now and again you may need senior people to basically show a little bit of tough love and bash some heads together for an example; like look guys and girls we are at Wembley, get your head out of your posterior and in the game we have all worked hard to get here, don't screw it up or if you have a wrestler accidentally going for the one attempting to break up this disagreement I think appropriate disarming technique is acceptable as long as you don't throw a punch or any aggression and then give them a similar mouthful.

But with Punk I haven't seen any of this in fact he has doubled down on continuing to say what he likes when he likes when he told us in a small video little and pieces including telling us to go when eating grass. As far as I'm concerned I would very much like to see him out of AEW, he doesn't deserve the opportunity to finish off his career story in AEW, my opinion on Mr Punk is never going to change from now on it is very similar to Jeff Hardy's career; both of them but individually could have generational talents in their own rights. But in one way or another they are self-destructive, so the wrestling community if we were all being honest with ourselves they have had a up-and-down career, but we are left with what could have been and additionally if it is true we are having to have a brand split kind of situation between The Elite [Dynamite] and Punk [Collision,]to keep them apart most of the time; that is just incredibly sad, childish and pathetic considering everyone is heading towards their late 30s on an average and not forgetting EVP’s as well, it is about time everyone grew up and to use the phrase from the WWE "Do what is best for business.”I would greatly prefer to push the younger talent that have shown their worth, you know the guys and girls that got us/this company through a global pandemic. For an example Ricky Starks; yes I have deliberately chosen this individual based on I believe he is a main eventer and he keeps showing that he can be trusted with the company such as going to see a friend Cody Rhodes at WWE and over the last couple of days I have seen elements of his four pillars comments. Maybe Mr Punk could take lessons from Starks, because it shows that Starks can respectfully this respect the company without completely dropping a grenade and of what I have seen The Outsiders: the AEW Women's Champion Toni Storm, Saraya and Ruby Soho and the surrounding wrestlers, including on a separate subject the new AEW TBS Champion Kris Statlander; so everything is slowly but surely getting on track; so I will leave this content on a question; if everything is slowly but surely getting some form of forward momentum, why oh why would you want to bring back someone like CM Punk which has been already proven yes he can be a needle pusher, but in my honest opinion his needle pushing potential is slowly but surely being overshadowed by his ability to drop a real life in a wrestling sense pipe bomb and destroy everything they are trying to build?

 

Wasted: Natalya vs. Champ The Judgement Day's Rhea Ripley [with Dominik Mysterio;] Singles Match for the WWE SmackDown Championship at Night of Champions 2023 by AverageMansReviews - Spoilers Alarm!

Wasted: Natalya vs. Champ The Judgement Day's Rhea Ripley [with Dominik Mysterio;] Singles Match for the WWE SmackDown Championship at Night of Champions 2023 by AverageMansReviews - Spoilers Alarm!

Reasons for why this match/match slot qualifies to be in this series:

* The WWE shows disrespect to one of its most loyal and technically skilled wrestlers in Natalya, which also is highly respected and seen as the mother hen backstage in the female locker rooms and I mean this respectfully rightly so.

* It goes on for just over 1 minute

* In another series of content; Recommendation of: NXT Battlegrounds 2023 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2023/05/recommendation-of-wwe-night-of.html I gave this match/match slot 1/10 and I stand by that.

No one puts baby in a corner: yes for those wrestling fans or people within the wrestling bubble. I have no problem with the match result, because we all knew it needed to happen. But however I do have a problem with the time they were given, even though very, very short match outlay they had in place even in theory it is and was designed to protect Natalya or if you have seen this match/match slot I will just say let's just go with try and protect. It doesn't or didn't protect her in the slightest, because just based on these very two strong reasons; 1 Natalya has been wrestling for quite years now, so she wouldn't naturally fall for this and 2 if she does which she did it just makes her look incredibly stupid as a babyface, but then again this is the WWE and that is usually how they like their babyfaces. But there is no way in hell one of your best female wrestlers should be getting jobbed period.

I mean I don't see Roman Reigns getting jobbed out so I don't see why Natalya should be either. For the people that don't know what makes these two generation wrestlers is they represent a cornerstone of the WWF/WWE; Reigns [Anoa'i] and Natalya [Hart] and just in case some people come back to me and say; how about this wrestler that has a family connection but still got jobbed out? You see my answer to that is simple; those other names may have retired from in ring competition or gone and done something else, but when you have the generation wrestlers that has put in the time and really been a mainstay around the WWE at minimum this company should show them a little bit of respect not to be jobbed out in this manner. This is where I should really point out; if this match went for something like 5 minutes I really wouldn't have a problem here. By the way it should be noted I don't care about time restraints or whatever if you can't find another 4 minutes somewhere in this event that is tragically sad, all they had to do was cut off a little bit here and a little bit there on other things and on top of that they should have in this match/match slot made  Natalya come across as a stiff challenge, so that Ripley using the same match outlay but this slightly longer version, to put across that was harder than I anticipated, I won't take anyone for granted again, it was a good thing Dom was here. So everyone wins here; we get Ripley getting a new small wrinkle to a character and Natalya getting a little put over as she can still hang with the younger talent.

So just to finish off; yes I get what had to happen here, but I don't like how things went down to get the us from point A to point B with essentially a colossal squash match.