Average Extra of: Billie Piper was never going to be the new Doctor Who 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Billie Piper was never going to be the new Doctor Who 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Related content:  Average Extra of: Russell T. Davies statement on his and Doctor Who's future in 2026 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/06/average-extra-of-russell-t-davies.html

Warning: there is going to be some censored adult language

What the hell is going on here?: Because I was just about to start on another piece of content and then it came to my attention that Billie Piper was never going to be the new Dr. Who, so what was the fudgin' point of seeing her? Or her agreeing to do this cameo when she must have known including Russell T. Davies that it would have sped up the speculation mill... I mean I defended her in the previous related content; Average Extra of: Russell T. Davies statement on his and Doctor Who's future in 2026, because how things looked; it looks as if she was getting screwed out of a job role, but in reality she was either knowing, but unintentionally screwing with the fan base, which unintentional or whatever it leaves a bad taste.

Because I don't know maybe just maybe I have been watching Doctor Who for a good portion of my life and whenever I see a new re-generation 99.9% of the time that will be the new Doctor Who unless of having multiple Doctors [I was just thinking I would cover my back with that little detail.]

Okay I am slightly urinated off she is not going to be in the new Doctor Who, but that is nothing compared to my frustration over the over arcing massive problem that can be easily summed up in this one question; what is Doctor Who now? I mean we all knew what used to be and stand for; the last Time Lord of Gallifrey; protecting the timelines with his various companions and has the ability to regenerate up to 13 times and after that death; no more, dead as a dodo.

But nowadays this person doesn't know if they are coming or going, pronouns specialist; now with a modified back story to have endless regenerations, which is lucky because especially over modern times, these Doctors last the equivalent of maybe just over on average 3 years.

I mean if no one knows what this universe is about anymore, the sad reality is; is anyone going to miss it until apparently sometime in 2028? Because as things stand they even get someone in or a unit in with real concrete ideas to re-integrate this universe or just face it this franchise has been well and truly cooked and should be left alone permanently.

 

 

Crazy Moon 1987 by AverageMansReviews

Crazy Moon 1987 by AverageMansReviews

Review Time

Warning: there will be flashing effects/colourful effects/drugs/animal waste/ hanging/disabled community/mental health/medical and any references I make towards being misfits, I mean in the confines of this movie only.

Two misfits meet one another: briefly; we meet Brooks [Kiefer Sutherland:] he is an kleptomaniac, afraid of water, struggling to deal with the loss of his mother, he also has a brother, they also come from a wealthy family and it is his birthday where his father has given him money to get a car, so he gets a motorcycle with sidecar. Brooks spots a nice young woman by the name of Anna [Vanessa Vaughan:] she is deaf from birth, but she can read lips, she works in a shop, she also lived with other deaf people and has plans to go around Europe on her own.

Generally speaking: the storyline/script; it is based around is short time in these characters lives and that is it; I am just indicating this is a situation/portion amount of these characters lives outlay and that is all we get. The framework and pacing of this roughly 85 minutes film is somewhat a liability; based on character developments and performances; one hand I get it; it is meant to construct Brooks' world with this 1940's music and wardrobe, which having said that wears incredibly thin after a very short time; so I get it, I don't have to like it, but I get it; either as a separate entity or a commanding aspect. But on the other hand; it does undercut our lead partnership from time to time especially Anna/Vaughan which I hasten to add is absolutely not a reflection of her performance; but if you have ever spent any time around different forms of disability; they all find their different ways to communicate to whatever level; so when you have our lead partnership communicating/without communicating this background music really does not our lead partnership off their stride from time to time; it is absolutely fine if they are dancing or running or swimming those moments are fine, but other than that the background music needed to go and that is me pretty nicely. But other than that the actual pacing is good.

Comedy, art, character development, performances and action; Brooks accidentally steals this mannequin, from Anna's shop and throughout the film uses it, in like a few different ways, you see when the background music doesn't feel out of place, more importantly when it is able to capture the on-screen chemistry between our partnership then it works incredibly well and how it should do with the physical aspects I have already referenced, we also have a coming-of-age component to this project between not only our lead partnership, but also between Brooks and his brother and then we have a change up of background music to signify a more mature Brooks. Broadly speaking the performances of this entire cast are all good, but our lead partnership of Brooks/Sutherland and Anna/Vaughan is absolutely spot-on and priceless so much so I feel comfortable without question saying without them this film would have fallen flat on his face.

This film receives: 7/10, this film is good; I wanted to give this film something slightly a bit higher, because of the positives, but because of the negatives being what they are this marking is the right outcome and there is an ongoing seen under some of the ending credits

 

Average Extra of: UK Government Now Decide to Ban Under 16's from the vast majority of Social Media Platform 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: UK Government Now Decide to Ban Under 16's from the vast majority of Social Media Platform 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: The Government to Consider Banning Facebook for Under 16's in 2026 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/02/average-extra-of-government-to-consider.html and Average Extra of: The Government Rejects Banning Under 16's from Social Media in 2026 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/03/average-extra-of-government-rejects.html

Warning/Disclaimer: there is going to be some censored adult language and references. Disclaimer any references relating to computer programs or anything like this I will not be held responsible for if anyone chooses to act upon it; any references or all references used in this content are strictly to show or indicate that this current government are absolutely clueless and their efforts futile, so once again I will not be held responsible if someone chooses to act upon this.

Yesterday it was announced: that the UK Government will be banning anyone under the age of 16 from all social media, personally this government doesn't know if it is coming or going, based on the related content of the subject matter and let's be honest with one another as far as I can tell, so this is just my opinion this is just an attempt to appease some of the British public and to hopefully bring back some of the Labour voters on side before the next General Election sometime in the middle of 2029 at the latest.

Because slowly but surely the UK is becoming a dictatorship and instead of holding the parents responsible for their own children and not teaching their own children about this big world out there, which in turn when they are out there they don't have the skills to deal with any form of life other than potentially crying about someone not using the right pronouns or/and anything other then someone that doesn't look cosmetically good-looking so consequently they have no value and should be shoned, the UK government has stepped in to already take away the right for an 18-year-old plus to freely watch pornography if they so choose to without some form of ID.

But and this is a big but you see anyone under the age of 45 and has some computer knowledge and spent time around computers would know this very small but very large like the Grand Canyon loophole or at minimum I am optimistic that my knowledge would work; that there are such things as VPN's [Virtual Private Network; like there is one extremely popular one that if you spend some time on YouTube content creators now and again will advertise it: and this is crucial for you to understand at the creation of this content in the UK they are not and I will repeat that not a legal, so I am perfectly fine to reference this; but other countries may vary and no I have never used one.]

So for those people that have no idea what I'm talking about roughly speaking; VPNs are basically private networks that for an example even though you live in the UK you could set your location to the US and get that version of Netflix or I don't know in theory set your location to somewhere that would allow you access to a minimum 18+ pornography or/and social media platforms and by doing so would make these new decrees from our overlords obsolete so yet again consequently absolutely clueless.

How about doing something useful like cracking down on places such as OnlyFans, you know having 17-year-old girls, waiting to turn 18 so they can spread their legs and take lots of penis and semen or/and vagina, to make lots of money and become the next Bonnie Blue, whilst simultaneously contributing to the mental health and loneliness epidemic; whilst women are exploiting this as for someone like myself I have repeatedly and consistently been reminded the only way I will ever have any form of sex again be it virtually or not is by paying for it which is absolutely fudgin' hilarious [obviously I am being heavily sarcastic] if you were to think about it for two seconds, from the perspective of; so I have to put in a lot of information to watch 18+ pornography, to apparently protect children as young somewhere between 12-17-year-olds; but they themselves have come on to an 18-year-old plus website looking for sexual release; but no one's blaming the parents for not using child lock on their Internet search.

But on adult websites as soon as they turn 18 they can prostitute themselves as much as they like on any adult platform, they clearly don't see in essence what they are doing and this government are allowing to do is to repeat the cycle for the next generation and so on and so forth, but the ironic thing is; the real life form of prostitution is illegal in the UK, and for those people that say I am not prostituting myself on these sexual websites; if you are getting paid for sexual gratification of another person and yourself; you are a prostitute, nothing more nothing less and don't make me laugh about calling yourself an entrepreneur, you are a prostitute plain and simple.

Finally just out of interest; you may be wondering why the UK government hasn't gone after somewhere like OnlyFans; it's because in one way or another they pay a lot of tax to the UK, so I will leave this content on this point; don't be misguided that this government is trying to protect those under 18, because as far as I can tell they won't try and stem the flow of newly turned adults from joining places like this, because of the amount of money the government can make so by definition they are hypocrites.

 

 

Hidden Agenda 2001 by AverageMansReviews

Hidden Agenda 2001 by AverageMansReviews

Review Time

Warning: there is going to be flashing effects/colourful effects/shooting/burning/torture/drowning/medical

Daedalus network,: briefly; we meet the creator of this mainframe which is designed to give new identities and previous ones secret; former NSA Agent Jason Price [Dolph Lundgren:] other than creating this network he and consequently his little group work for very lucrative contracts, but eventually they take this case after the death of Price's best friend.

Generally speaking: the storyline/script is something solid and good, but having said all of this; the execution is far from the best as roughly speaking this film goes on for 94 minutes and man it is ridiculously slow and what is it with these turning effects roughly just 90° angle; I don't get it, it brings nothing of positivity to the film, all it does is bring confusion as in what the hell was that? I mean I get the slow motion effects sometimes used in this film with the martial arts sequences; because that was filmmaking in the early 2000's for you and not forgetting this sometimes used background music of alternative techno or some kind of music like that.

Action and art ; as I was saying we have martial arts, including but not limited to our lead character Price torturing someone for information; by drowning them until they gave up the information by pushing ahead underneath the water in this fish tank and later on in one way or another we have some snow in some scenes/sequences.

Character developments and performances; they are both solid versions of what they were going for here; solid character types to go with solid performances to create solid chemistry.

This film receives: 4/10, this film is mixed; it is just really, really slow and consequently this project gets given this mark, I hasten to add that one point or another it was looking at a slightly higher mark, because on the whole it doesn't claim to be anything other than what it is; which is a crime, investigations and action movie; but man it definitely needed a rocket behind it, because with some speed/momentum behind it; this film could have been good, instead of being left very high and very dry.

 

Calling It Out of: Ilja Dragunov apparently not been seen as a top guy in WWE in 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Calling It Out of: Ilja Dragunov apparently not been seen as a top guy in WWE in 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Wasted: UK & US NXT Kay Lee Ray a.k.a. WWE's Alba Fyre main roster run has been mostly embarrassing Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/01/wasted-uk-us-nxt-kay-lee-ray-aka-wwes.html and Calling It Out of: WWE Creative, Stale Product And It's Our Fault in 2026: will contain other content as well Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/06/calling-it-out-of-wwe-creative-stale.html

Warning: there will be some censored adult language references in one way or another.

Well this is a hot steaming pile of horse manure!: So you spend years, so we aren't talking about a short time here... years upon years building him up; whilst winning championships/accolades like; NXT United Kingdom Championship [including but not limited to his epic rivalry with Walter,] NXT Year-End Award [twice,] Male Superstar of the Year [2003] and Match of the Year vs. Carmelo Hayes at NXT No Mercy and on the main roster WWE United States Champion [as of this content being first created; this stands at a one-time reign.]

So it takes NXT/WWE main roster since 2019 to 2026 to apparently realise in their own mindset that he is not a main event guy; when everyone else knows he is 100% the real deal and should absolutely be in and around the main event scenes; let's talk about what is possibly really going on here and I did say it years ago, when Walter or/and Dragunov get to the main rosters, how are they going to book two very much very unstoppable forces; meaning they were going to have to be creative with the booking/outlay of their matches and yes they have limited Walter's losses, but seemingly as far as I can see it they want to obviously keep Walter within the WWE and clearly can't be bothered with Dragunov, because he is a pound for pound wrestler/fighter that is the only one that can go toe to toe with Walter, so by the WWE saying they don't see him as a main event guy, from me that translates into it just can't be bothered, so let's just say we don't see him as a main event guy.

So I find myself asking this question what precisely is the point of NXT? No seriously what is the point of it? Because you have made big names down there and absolutely treated them like donkey diarrhoea on the main roster; here is a very small selection of names; Shinsuke Nakamura, Carmelo Hayes, Dragunov, Piper Niven, Alba Fyre and Sol Ruca and let's be honest on the main roster more or less they have been made to look like chumps.

Dragunov without question needs to go somewhere like either NJPW or AEW when his current WWE contract runs out sometime in the future, because I don't know about everyone else, but I am finding the current product incredibly stale, to the point where I am vaguely, incredibly vaguely keeping up-to-date with things just on social media and I have to be honest it really does annoy me when you have someone like Dragunov that could really freshen up anything and yet they don't have the vision to use him as a top wrestler; and just for the record I can't stand saying superstar so that is why I went with top wrestler.

 

The Devil's Own 1997 by AverageMansReviews

The Devil's Own 1997 by AverageMansReviews

Review Time

Warning: there will be flashing effects/colourful effects/domestic tourism/terrorism/domestic violence/religion/shooting/immigration/racism/bodily functions/medical/reference to Russia.

This film is based around the IRA: briefly; after some exposition character developments; Francis "Frankie" McGuire/other name [Younger: Shane Dunne/Older: Brad Pitt:] he is a member of the IRA and he has to go to the USA; New York City to complete this arms deal and whilst he is there, a supporter of the IRA pleases him family that has no idea who they have just into their own as he also has a false identity; this kind of family; the husband and father his name is Sergeant Tom O'Meara [Houston Ford:] he is a clean and hard-working police officer that opens his house and family to this stranger.

Generally speaking: the storyline/script; well I have to be honest in conjunction with the framework and pacing of this 111 minutes film there isn't much going on for large amounts of this movie and when it does get going, we are very quickly heading towards the final section of this project.

Action and art; obviously we have weapons being used and we get to see some Irish music being played

Character developments and performances; if this is what they were going for they hit the jackpot, I have to be honest I did cringe when Sergeant O'Meara was talking to his wife about this incident, as broadly speaking am paraphrasing for his entire career he hadn't done anything wrong and basically isn't going to start now: now here is why I cringed; I wasn't expecting him to keep this secret, but in the context of this film it highlights that a Caucasian, middle-class American that has no or very little concept of anyone remotely different or less than himself; basically what really got up my nose was how much of a sanctimonious person this individual is and allow me to make it crystal clear again I wasn't expecting him to overlook it, but please just get off your soapbox.

The performances were what you see is what you get Ford was trying to keep this film going and Pitt is as you will see is not the best here, on reflection and this is speculation but also a fair point; that this film is really quite a slow so in these two were left very exposed; I am not making any excuses here for them, just pointing out that this film has in essence no actual momentum so you can't paint over the cracks or better yet it magnifies any problems, but regardless this film is so dry that it could easily set tumbleweeds alight.

This film receives: 2/10, this film is poor; I mean this is where I would try to say something slightly positive, but anything other than me saying it had enough to scrape up to this mark would be a liar; so I am just going to stick to what islanders said and this film has 1 Negative award accredited to its name; The Stinkers Bad Movie Awards 1997 Stinker Award Most Annoying Fake Accent Brad Pitt Shared with: Seven Years in Tibet

 

Average Extra of: Russell T. Davies statement on his and Doctor Who's future in 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Russell T. Davies statement on his and Doctor Who's future in 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: Doctor Who Christmas Special 2026 is Cancelled [and other content related to this subject] Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/06/average-extra-of-doctor-who-christmas.html

Warning: there is going to be some censored adult language and references.

This is from Russell T. Davies: russelltdavies63

 "And so GOODBYE from me to Doctor Who but HELLO to a big new future for the show, as the BBC announces it’s putting the show out to tender. As a result, there won’t be a Christmas Special - we only cooked that up to guarantee a future when no one knew what would happen, but now we do know, there’s no need for it. You’ll have to wait a bit longer for new Doctor Who… but you’ll be waiting for MORE Doctor Who than a one-off. So it’s worth it! For the record: there was no script, I never wrote it, and no actor was ever approached to play the next Doctor. You may disagree; fine, sit in that chair and wait to be proved right. You’ll wait a time 🪑 Now I’m as excited as anyone to see what comes next! Will they keep the theme tune? Will they lose the blue box? Will they bring back the Drahvin?! It’s all up for grabs, which is so Doctor Who, exciting and unpredictable and new! Here comes the future, vworp vworp 🌪️@bbcdoctorwho ♥️"

I am going to begin here with; for any up-and-coming people in TV or film this is how precisely not to leave a project or/and a franchise.

Because I smell a strong whiff of ball-manure and this is just based on my opinion mixed with common sense as things stand, because if we are going to allies what this statement is actually saying on one level or another, so let me get this right you cooked something up which now by your own words you don't have the need for it; on one hand I get it, I know how roughly the TV landscape works, but on the other hand if this was a possible outcome why Oh why did you reveal the incoming Doctor? As you will see this will not be the only time I will be referring to this; so once again let me get this right; by the sound of it we were going to have another regeneration for a new Doctor [Billie Piper] for potentially a one-off Christmas Special... is that what you are trying to indicate? Because if so that would have been a steaming pile of manure, because I don't know if anyone else has noticed, but we are going through regeneration as quick as changing your socks at the moment, but then again you make reference to the fact you haven't written the script for something that wasn't going to happen... so what was the point of revealing Piper?

Can I just point out with you going on about you can sit in a chair and wait to be proven right; it makes you sound like a complete and utter fudgin' moron and I am being nice here... And this is one of those rare occasions where I am justified in this assessment, based on the very tiny detail you were the show runner, so everything that has combined in this massive slump for years as it relates to the Doctor Who franchise guess where the but stops? I will give you a couple of seconds to think about it ... I am waiting?... If you said you... you would be correct, so this childish snapback at some fans is and was pointless, unless you were talking to a person looking back at you in the mirror... then by all means please continue.

The only ones I have any empathy for is the people that work on the show and need it to make a living and obviously Piper; as is it just me or has she been thrown under the bus here; holding the bag of manure; as in based on what we saw she was going to come in, now that is all up in the air possibly with Doctor Who going in a different direction? Who knows at this point especially with it being confirmed that Davies had nothing in place or worked on anything, so as far as I am concerned Davis can really fudge off!

It has also been indicated that we won't be seeing Doctor Who until sometime in 2028, which if this is remotely true or got the smell of truth around in in any way, I would feel comfortable suggesting this timescale easily sounds right as in a nutshell they have to get their house in order and just because it's the right thing to do I would definitely do something with Piper in the future in Doctor Who, because it is the right thing to do by everyone; because it would bring everyone back home side that had maybe grown tired of this franchise and its direction.