Average Extra of: Premiership Problem: West Ham vs. Arsenal Match Robbery: 10/05/2026: Part 2 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Premiership Problem: West Ham vs. Arsenal Match Robbery: 10/05/2026: Part 2 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: Premiership Problem: West Ham vs. Arsenal Match Robbery: 10/05/2026 Link

I like how the rest of the football community: get it and the vast majority of Arsenal fans or anyone remotely connected to Arsenal just don't get it or want to get it. Meaning okay you want to disallow the West Ham equaliser for a foul on the Arsenal goalkeeper: David Raya. From the rest of the football community to Arsenal fans; where has this ruling being for somewhere between 18 months to 2 years? If you don't get it yet allow me to explain, we are not just talking about this situation, we are talking about multiples situations and as I referenced in the connecting content one of the main reasons that the Arsenal fans don't want to discuss things as adults or being unbiased is because they know they have profited the most with 17 goals using similar or identical tactics, where the football community has slightly moved the question on to okay this allow that goal, now how about the 17 goals Arsenal have scored this season?

Because over just the last 24 hours I have seen other content creators asking reasonable questions about this goal for Arsenal or that goal for Arsenal, based on seemingly the standardbearer of the West Ham disallowed goal

For me Professional Game Match Officials Limited have royally screwed up, because they have put in place this massive grey area of what is and isn't a foul and for a long time now Arsenal have been exploiting that grey area, as things stand allegedly West Ham will be going to talk to the PGMOL as they should, because it West Ham get relegated based on one point, then questions will have to be asked and also like to referenced in the connecting content by hook or by crook Arsenal have found a way to win the premiership good for them... but based on this turn of events if they go on to win the league there will be forever this asterix against this premiership title win, because of the 17 goals that showed or shouldn't have been allowed based on a rule that hadn't been enforced for a large time and then, conveniently when it mattered, but don't get it yet every decision or every opportunity of a decision matches regardless of where a club is in whatever league and for those Arsenal fans massively celebrating possibly winning the league, let me remind you; you are making a rod for your own back for years to come.

 

 

Average Extra of: Premiership Problem: West Ham vs. Arsenal Match Robbery: 10/05/2026 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Premiership Problem: West Ham vs. Arsenal Match Robbery: 10/05/2026 by AverageMansReviews

Now we have a problem... Premiership: the problem is quite clearly you have made a pig's ear of this one decision to disallow this goal for West Ham and the funny thing is over minus Arsenal fans obviously you have all the different football fans from different leagues myself included asking if this rule has been in place for the last 18 months, how come it hasn't been remotely enforced? Further to the point how come whenever Arsenal score from this method the goal hasn't been disallowed? I have seen many incidents where they have been basically hassling the goalkeeper and handling the goalkeeper in question including but not limited to the defenders yet the goal stood.

Yet when no disrespect but a smaller club in West Ham do it... you take every proper caution roughly about 4 minutes, you have a proper conversation about it, you look in any look again and then you look again, this incident is a national embarrassment.

My language when I say; it is a national embarrassment, I am absolutely fine in using it, because minus the Arsenal fans again, because anyone with two brain cells would have the intelligence to point out that Arsenal scoring 17 goals [as of this content being first created,] using this style of corner as in everything on top of the goalkeeper;] if the referee in it had used the same protocol I can see 10 goals being talked off easily; for essentially manhandling either the goalkeeper or defensive players; this is sloppy refereeing and on top of that or they actually don't discuss the way that Arsenal have brought the premiership into national shame; with the alleged way they play football, taking up that much time as possible, hitting the floor as much possible, but then again get angry when a small club like West Ham play them at their own game, I like how people are saying Arsenal's Number 1 goalkeeper; David Raya is the best and will win them the premiership: unless he is mutating into Spider-Man; his hands/possession spend a lot longer then 8 seconds around the football, so by letter of the law you should have booked twice for time wasting consequently sent off: just the record Raya can't hold a candle to Peter or/and Kasper Schmeichel: they individually earned their accolades.

The sad thing is; we have had this for most of the season where the Arsenal fans have been deluded and yes you have been deluded, as I have right now some Arsenal fans goading me on social media and I am not going to bite, because... Good for you... you have found a way to win by hook or by crook... good for you.

Now allow me to educate you... you poor Arsenal fans or the majority of you... for me personally I couldn't be associated with this absolute joke of a football club and its deluded hostile fans, the only ones that have any dignity putting on the Arsenal shirt is your women's side, as they play with passion, highly skilled and play the game how it should be played and whilst I am talking about Arsenal can somebody please put a sock in Martin Keown's mouth, I can listen to anyone else that has played for Arsenal, defending Arsenal or anything over just not him, at least any other ex-player tells it as it is good, bad, the ugly, but everything that comes out of Keown's mouth is completely 100% biased and 9 times out of 10 I don't want to see anyone lose their job, but for him and on the biased reasoning I would like him to not be given a platform to be honest, if you can't do a professional job and be unbiased then get stepping.

But I digress; back to the Arsenal fans; you are aware that if you win the premiership this year, you will be the most undeserving team to ever do this and on top of that every football club around the country would be absolutely delighted for you to fall on your face for the next decade at least to not win it right? That is the kind of level at minimum dislike you are cultivating with your biased, loud brash attitude and if you can put up with that; that is all good, but when the bubble bursts, don't be surprised if there isn't any sympathy or empathy or any kind words, because as things stand you're making a rod your own back that will eventually hit you on the butt.

To finish off; I hope the premiership review that this whole season; to make it harder for Arsenal or/and any other clubs that are thinking of adopting these tactics to make me think twice, because by the looks of it West Ham will be paying the ultimate price, which I actually feel an element of empathy or sympathy towards them, because they actually took Arsenal's tactics and when they could they actually put some flair into their football and actually attacked; I know this is a hollow victory but knowing you did nothing wrong and the West Ham manager: Nuno Espírito Santo; in theory should be absolutely delighted with how the system worked, and if you do end up getting relegated it is imperative he stays as your manager; with him he will bring you back up straight away, without him you might be back in 5 years or more.

Additional: because I have just seen a clip of Danny Murphy; making this reference because it's Arsenal; I can't make this more clear and this is where I think the football pundits get it wrong and misunderstand; we don't have a problem with Arsenal per se; we have a problem with Arsenal's tactics and how seemingly it is perfectly fine for them to use these tactics, but for an example when West Ham mirror these tactics; then there was this massive enquiry... I thought this was obvious... but obviously not Murphy thanks for clearing that up for us. Yes we want different names on the premiership title, but where the resentment comes from is not like this and as I have said this roughly 3 times in this content or referenced in this content... when West Ham go literally toe to toe with Arsenal using the same tactics, but when West Ham scored goal in basically the same fashion as Arsenal have all season... then the football community.... yet surprisingly angry and if you're wondering my team as of this content being first created again is not in the premiership, so I'm just speaking as a football fan.

 

Calling It Out of: Danhausen & Mystery Partner at WWE Backlash 2026 by AverageMansReviews - Spoiler Alarm!

Calling It Out of: Danhausen & Mystery Partner at WWE Backlash 2026 by AverageMansReviews - Spoiler Alarm!

Related content: Calling It Out of: The Entire Mismanagement of Sol Ruca and/or Zaria in 2026 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/04/calling-it-out-of-entire-mismanagement.html

Warning: there will be some censored adult language references in one way or another.

What is this absolute manure?!: Seriously what the hell is this manure???! It isn't the 1990's anymore, it was in bad taste back then... it has aged like milk, I was genuinely just about to go off to bed and I saw this manure in my timeline/feed... so what the hell is this? If you guessed I am absolutely furious, so instead of putting Danhausen we have someone respectable and someone that I don't know we would like to see like Mr. Iguana and his sidekick La Yesca, we get this absolute steaming pile of vomit in the form of Minihausen. I mean I am not being arrogant here, but my idea in this content took all of 30 seconds to think and to put together, I am now starting to really wonder if Mr McMahon is back as the head of creative? Because this is the kind of horse manure he would put on... as if he was trying to amuse himself.

I know, I know I keep saying it... but what the hell is this fudge manure?! I can't stand it, I hated with a passion and you expect good people to go to these events and good money to watch this manure?

Paul Levesque should be ashamed of himself and not forgetting his creative team, for this absolute manure, I have either seen or heard of their creative manure lately and guess what I am not impressed, he needs to go, but he won't considering he has just been given a very lucrative extension lasting next three years at least.

 

Average Extra of: I am celebrity South Africa 2026: The Final & Beyond: Part 2 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: I am celebrity South Africa 2026: The Final & Beyond: Part 2 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: I am Celebrity South Africa 2026: The Chaos- Spoiler Alarm! Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/04/average-extra-of-i-am-celebrity-south.html , Average Extra of: I am Celebrity South Africa 2026: David Haye: His Controversial Comments about Women Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/05/average-extra-of-i-am-celebrity-south.html and then I am Celebrity South Africa 2026: The Final & Beyond Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/05/average-extra-of-i-am-celebrity-south_4.html

Warning: there will be some censored adult language references and yes I may as well give a trigger warning; the majority of this content is without doubt going to be triggering.

This aired Friday 24/04/2026 the Final: now let's begin with Jimmy Bullard; now it has been indicated that he plans to sue ITV for the reasons of; basically something to the effect of; unsafe and hostile work environment or some manure like that, now I am not a specialist or a legal mind, but I know for a fact will not hold up in court. Because all they have to do; meaning ITV would have to show the footage at Bullard picking Thomas and the case would crumble, because as long as Thomas didn't or doesn't get physically with Bullard; they can say that anything after that from the perspective of Thomas; is and was at minimum a reasonable reaction, in fact Bullard should be extremely careful that Thomas doesn't suit him for potentially a Defamation of Character due to this incident, so Bullard just take the money that you are contracted to take from appearing on this show and just go away and shut the fudge up.

So we come to influence Friday Final; where minus watching the last recorded footage, let's be honest manure hit the fan throughout this live broadcast, where we head Bullard continuing with these accusations where for the first time in their careers; Anthony McPartlin & Declan Donnelly [a.k.a. Ant & Dec: that if you don't know are legendary British duo of TV presenters amongst other things;] that for the first time in their careers let their TV personas drop for a minute and went head to head; Bullard and David Haye; about this incident between Bullard and Thomas and other things; where they defended Thomas, because as I may have illustrated by now he really didn't do anything wrong here, because everything I have said is just in the boundaries of acceptable behaviour based in this situation at that time, including we had some celebrities walk off stage Sinitta and then Gemma Collins and Thomas was crowned the Legend of this series.

Now usually they have an extra program, it is quite common practice in UK TV land to do this these days, I only bring this up to now say that Bullard and Haye; were ejected and didn't take part in this program.

ITV might have a big David Haye problem?: Before I continue to stress a massive disclaimer that yes I have done some research, but like I said earlier I am not of a legal mind, so I am just coming from at best common sense and street smarts. You see originally I was thinking that Haye's team was going to go for negligence; the negligence being; until I did some research I was not aware of Thomas's medical history of: psoriatic arthritis diagnosed 2023. So my thinking was... okay maybe the contestants/celebrities were not aware of this condition which in summary: it is a daily problem with symptoms such as joints in pain, swollen fingers and toes and many other aspects; which as someone that servers with spasticity on a daily basis I know these two conditions are very different, but where they could be similar is the all-round tidiness of dealing/carrying these disabilities around a daily basis; which if we were to think about it for two seconds; having limited food and daily tasks would have eventually took a toll on his body/or anyone's body for that matter, would would have consequently would have changed his mood swings and mental frailties if the individual in question has any. This could have happened before, during or after Haye's as described allegedly banter or other; it was alleged by Thomas that at some point Haye was informed by the show that he should apologise to Thomas.

The problems I have with this situation and how it is turning out is... and I can absolutely get away with saying this as a fellow disabled person with a completely different disability but as someone dealing with spasticity; did the show runners know of Thomas' medical history?, If his fellow celebrities knew what they cut him some slack? Specifically Haye, when does banter become insults? And the uncomfortable question now is should Thomas had been in there to begin with? Because I have partly seen how Thomas has been dealing with all this alleged stress and even I have to say man grow some balls.

Because of my disability; all of my body hurts throughout the day in different ways; including but not limited to spastic body, joint pain and occasionally ramming my head into a wall; because when I sneeze and if I am close to a wall/or anything hard and I lose control of my body the momentum means in short it is going to hurt and in the next couple of days I will have blood snot it is where my nose has healed/dried and everything comes down.

But Haye has been vocal so my source in this context is Haye himself; where he is going for/his team is going for Defamation of Character; which based on everything I have said in this content unlike Bullard I can see Haye winning a similar amount; yes I can see ITV alleging no wrongdoing obviously, but the strength of the defence they will imply that Haye's behaviour wasn't exactly crystal clean, but the problem is for me whenever I looked into the situation such as this one and I get that smell of... something isn't quite adding out like what we have most of the male celebrities saying that Thomas gave as good as he got, but we the audience didn't see proof of it? Why did Thomas only bring up his mental health when it suited him? And yes just for the record; for those that don't know I am also a member of the mental health community as well; but by today's standards let's just say I am the real deal, it is a part of me but I don't think it all of me and the real ones with mental health issues know this previous sentence and what it means properly.

On reflection/conclusion; I think ITV made a massive mistake bringing Thomas back, they should have safeguarded everyone better, but another point of the uncomfortable truth/reality is they had a very strong divide even before the teams aspect of the older generations and what I like to call the woke and entitled generation; I will now only deal with this situation if there are any major updates. Oh yes I have just had an idea we may not actually find out, because if there is a settlement of any description whatsoever I feel quite confident we may or may not ever find out because as a part of the agreement David Haye may not be able to discuss this for a little while or at all, but we will have to wait and see either sooner or much, much later if at all.

 

The Sheep Detectives 2026 by AverageMansReviews

The Sheep Detectives 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Review Time

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/ animal cruelty/animal biting/drugs/vehicle crash/vehicle hit

There has been a murder: Police Officer Tim Derry [Nicholas Braun:] he is in charge of this crime investigation, but he isn't the smartest of police officers, but he gets some assistance from George Hardy [Hugh Jackman:] he is the Shepherd to this flock of sheep that assist this officer with his criminal investigation of this incident; one of these sheep's are named Lily [voice by: Julia Louis-Dreyfus:] she is the leader of this flock, she is also a Shetland Sheep and she is very intelligent on working things out.

Generally speaking: the framework and pacing of this 109 minutes film is to begin with a complete disaster; it just didn't have anything to it; it was incredibly slow to the point where for a little while I fell asleep; But the crucially important thing is; after the opening section and beyond a little bit; things generally begin to find life and throughout the rest of the film it does bounce along at a good consistent pace

Comedy, action and art; we clearly going to have some animal comedy references such as a chicken actually crosses the road [in reference to; the comedy set up of why did the chicken Cross the Road?,] We have a couple of Rams waiting for the right moment to ram something and the setting of the sun is a beautiful image.

Character developments, performances and voice performances; the character developments are a mixture between good versions of what they need to be such as suspects and learning about life and as it relates to either the performances or/and voice performances they reflect their starting points of their character developments perfectly; the performances show little bit of growth throughout this film, but it is predominantly the sheep/voice performances that show the most evolution in their character developments and/or voice performances; so hypothetically and not giving any of this film away, if this title justifies the sequel they would have to without a shadow of doubt bring the entire cast back together again as they all really made this film their very own/in this village; I mean in theory and hypothetically they could make a revenge storyline; this will be a sequel storyline that would make sense; to finish off I am not saying this will happen.

This film receives: 8/10, this film is excellent; when this film does settle down and get going; it is a charming little film of a little village, its community, some sheep’s loyalty to their shepherd and yes you may want to take some tissues with you, this film does have some extra bits and pieces in the formal little drawings and it has even though 1 winning award to its name; Heartland Film 2026

 

Saturday Night Live UK [Season 1,] Episode 5: Host: Host: Nicola Coughlan & Music: Foo Fighters by AverageMansReviews

Saturday Night Live UK [Season 1,] Episode 5: Host: Host: Nicola Coughlan & Music: Foo Fighters by AverageMansReviews

Warning: there is mature to adult themes/transformation/decomposing/Peter Mandelson/vehicle crash/reference to drugs, feminism, underage sex offender, the man formerly known as Prince Andrew so just Andrew, hanging, suicide, bodily functions, Epstein, animal cruelty and I will be using some adult censored languid references.

The Face of Comedy Award: Who Wants To Remain A Millionaire [short description: a interpretation of Who Wants To Be A Millionaire: featuring Keir Starmer and Peter Mandelson;] excellent skit.

What A Life! [short description: with a magazine publication skit, where they nothing to print, so they ask a member of their staff about her life and a lot of weird stuff happens to her;] this skit is good fun.

Bag Organiser [short description: commercial about this product and another product which is let's just say for those untidy people;] this is good

QVC's The Jewellery Store [short description: their guest has or/and is going through something weird;] excellent little piece of uncomfortable mayhem.

Weekend Update [short description: a comical look back over recent news stories; featuring Keir Starmer, Peter Mandelson and the Hand in Hand in Hand;] the Hand in Hand in Hand went much better than the first time it was used in a skit: Hand in Hand; this segment is excellent fun.

Learn To Fly [short description: this flight needs a pilot, this skit concept is based on the track/music video of Learn To Fly released in 1999 by Foo Fighters;] it had a rough start; as it virtually signals/implies/references men think they can fly a plane, but for the rest of the skit; it gets better and better.

Foo Fighters [short description: second performance;] is I am completely guessing here and presuming it is another new track; but however this one was and is supremely much better than the first; well it couldn't get much worse, but let's be positive; it sounded like the Foo Fighters.

Worst Hen-Do Ever [short description: well has clearly been a slasher sequence of events taking place here, but there is always one friend late to an event and we hear her events;] excellent skit as they talk to than one friend that things that they are life is so important, compared to what a horrific scene of what previously has just taken place.

45 Seconds with Fouragres: Fruits and Vege [short description: a musical/singing song; it does what it says on the tin and made reference to Epstein;] top-quality musical number to finish this episode and the actual tune is really catchy; I just can't remember all the lyrics.

The Face of Tragedy Award: Nicola Coughlan opening monologue/sequence of events [short description: she talks about her career, taking cocaine before the show;] it has a whiff of feminism about it, but then again it is all of a dumpster fire regardless of the beginning section sounding feminist.

The Magic Faraway Tree Rap Song [short description: Coughlan has come up with a rap song to accompany her latest movie and this skit turns into a musical number;] basically this is another steaming pile of garbage; I listened to all kinds of alternative music, I couldn't even understand it and its presentation was cheap and very tacky, and yet again somewhere around the later stages more feminism

Foo Fighters [short description: first performance;] I believe it to be one of the new tracks and to be honest; brutally honest; it is manure, as I referenced earlier I come from the alternative music side of things, I was really looking forward to this performance. But I had a feeling that they would break out some of their new stuff as they recently did on another UK appearance [The Graham Norton Show: Friday night 22/02/2026] and it is just bad; you just have a lot of noise with yelling and the most annoying thing is; towards the final section of this track they proved they can still perform to a high level as there is a section in this track where they slow everything down. The person I watched some of this content with agreed with me that this was manure and they would rather listen to Slipknot now, because at least they have a tune or a beat; in short this was just dog manure.

This episode receives: 8/10, this episode is excellent; yes this episode does have some downsides, but the upsides comfortably outweighed the downsides.

 

Average Extra of: Mortal Kombat 2021: Briefly Back at the Cinema in 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Mortal Kombat 2021: Briefly Back at the Cinema in 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Previous instalment/Related content: Mortal Kombat 2021 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2025/12/mortal-kombat-2021-by-averagemansreviews.html and then Average Extra of: Mortal Kombat II | Official Trailer: My Reaction Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2025/12/average-extra-of-mortal-kombat-ii.html

Warning: if you should go and see this film or seen this film; please just remember it isn't for those weak of heart and there is flashing effects/colourful effects.

This was put back on: at one on my local Cinema's you could go and see this film and half an hour later could go and see the new sequel Mortal Kombat II 2026, I couldn't put the person that I watch someone's content with through and my taxi driver, as I would have been getting back about around midnight, but don't worry I already have my ticket for the sequel next week and as I couldn't see the 2021 film when it was originally going through its run due to a little thing called Covid-19 I am now made up for that.

But now let's get down to business; the very basic version of the storyline is; Hiroyuki Sanada as Hanzo Hasashi/other character: he is a peaceful man, unfortunately he and his family gets attacked by Kuai Liang Clan led by Joe Taslim as Bi-Han/another character.

Big-screen experience: well this film is phenomenally entertaining on a big screen; you can really appreciate some more such as the artistic visions be them set design/location design or/and the dark graphic sequences of combat and anything else in the middle really; you can also simultaneously really appreciate the combat sequences be it martial arts/hand-in-hand or/and personal individual abilities such as for an example; Max Huang as Kung Lao: he is one of the protectors of Earth realm, he also protects the Shaolin  Temple, assists Lord Raiden and helps with training others, but when he removes his hat or better known as a Razor-Rimmed Hat or a Chakram Hat; be anywhere it isn't as one character in particular comes in the form a rough landing, so much so they are going to have a splitting headache in the morning.

The comedy is good natured, but keeping in tone with the mature two adults in of the project obviously I do hope the 2026 film, has a similar approach to their character developments, because if it worked spot on here, I see no reason to change the formula, obviously cater it around new or new things on; but I mean the level of character developments and its standards set in this title and hopefully bring back the same standard of high performance as from the returning or/and the new cast members; basically in a nutshell; the same again as it relates to their standards please... So if at any time you get to see this film on a big screen it is well worth it for sure.