Wednesday, 11 November 2026

Average Extra of: Russell Brand: Women Don’t Defend Their Own by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Russell Brand: Women Don’t Defend Their Own by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: Russell Brand to serve at Minimum Roughly 7 Years in Prison Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/11/average-extra-of-russell-brand-to-serve.html and Average Extra of: Lindsay Clancy: Mental Health & The Ramifications 2026 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/09/average-extra-of-lindsay-clancy-mental.html

Warning: I will be discussing adult and dark themes with censored adult language references throughout.

I have a lot to say and it isn't going to be pleasant: over what I have seen what with the Lindsey Clancy trial and now with this trial; I am now condensed based on recent information; that  the vast majority of men are not the problem; Yes we don't get a clean slate by any stretch of the imagination, but this content is going to be focusing on women, because As far as I can tell without sounding sexist which is not my motivation here your opinions changed as often as your mood swingers,  on one hand you defend from Clancy, From murdering her three children under the opinion, she had depression of a varying degree, But this week some of you have decided to defend Russell Brand, even though he did these heinous acts to women, even though these victims accounts of what I have heard are very fudgin’ descriptive,  you sit there behind your camera taking a massive dump on these victims as if they are the problem,  so why should men believe women when they have been allegedly sexually  assaulted if there is a good percentage of your own  gender that doesn't?

This is nothing to do with men right now; this is everything to do with women, because I will tell you the uncomfortable reality of two things; Because most men have learnt the hard way not to believe most women when it comes to sexual assault, because like myself I have been in situations where women have been working and angle and based on these two cases; you have been slowly but slowly putting women back in the kitchen; I will leave this content on a question, Because without question I guarantee you some of you will trip yourself up based on some of you have given different opinions on the previous two different cases; where based on my opinion and learning I can easily say three times; guilty, guilty and guilty; so here is the question; David Walliams; guilty or not guilty?  for context these situations happened roughly the same time as Brand; Williams appeared on his self titled talk show on Channel 4; where he had Williams on it; 24/11/2006; first-ever episode

 

Tuesday, 10 November 2026

Edward Scissorhands 1990 by AverageMansReviews

Edward Scissorhands 1990 by AverageMansReviews


Review Time

Warning: there is flashing effects/colorful effects/cutting/stabbing/shooting/animal cruelty/eletrocution/medical

Grandma tell me a story: briefly; this Grandma tells of the story of Edward Scissorhands [Johnny Depp:] he is a creation of his inventor/The Inventor [Vincent Price:] he expired before he could finish Edward; so Edward has these giant scissor hands for hands; Edward by nature is a softly spoken individual that means no harm, so when he gets encouraged to join the nearby neighborhood to experience more about life, things become gradually more and more complicated.

Generally speaking:  the storyline/script in conjunction with the character development and the framework; used at the of storyteller/origin and exposition character development with the present day; meaning like something like the 1950s as well with good pacing of a movie that is roughly 105 minutes long.

Art, character development, action and comedy; the art is very clear to see as it ranges from  gothic to eccentric 1950s decker colour systems and everything else in the middle; this is one of those rare occasions where I don't have to give too much detail, because  if or when you choose to watch this project; gothic styling or/ and the 1950s eccentricity will hit you in the face as soon as you come across them; but they are of the most highest quality and standards throughout this project, as Edward comes to realize he is very good at  styling things from bushes and hedges, to hair and dogs, but he doesn't seem to do too well with water beds.

Character development, performances and voice performance; the character development are a good reflection of their timeframe, so we have that housewives, whilst men went out work that kind of thing consequently we have the women gospeling and especially in one case in particular we have a woman that would like to feel Edwards point, but in  or fairness and bounce, I don't think she is with anyone or just because my back; we don't see a mister in her life. But for the vast majority of this neighborhood/community they are good people and they will try and do their best for Edward; Edward is a good individual, but they just want ready for one another; Depp leads this project masterfully as he becomes Edward; someone that hasn't had much interaction,  more often than not tries to do the right thing even though it may put him in deeper trouble, Depp is excellently supported by this cast in particular; Dianne Wiest as Peg Boggs: She is a Avon distributor, that takes Edward home with her and then later on we meet her daughter Winona Ryder as Kim Boggs: at first she doesn't like Edward; between this trio; strange harmless individuals are or should be entitled to be seen as human beings and the voice performance is good as well.

This film receives: 10/10, this film is top-notch entertainment; this is a classic for sure, this film most definitely needs to be seen once in your lifetime, especially now with these modern  generations believing that everything is based on looks and wealth, there is an ongoing sequence underneath the closing  credits to begin with, this film also has some awards accredited to its name  such as; 11 Winners which includes but not limited to Sant Jordi Awards 1992  Sant Jordi Best Foreign Film (Mejor Película Extranjera) Tim Burton and Best Foreign Actress (Mejor Actriz Extranjera) Winona Ryder Shared with: Mermaids. 26 Nominees which also include but not limited to; Academy Awards, USA 1991 Oscar Best Makeup Ve NeillStan Winston, Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films, USA 1992 Saturn Award Best Supporting Actress Dianne Wiest American Comedy Awards, USA 1991 American Comedy Award Funniest Actor in a Motion Picture (Leading Role) Johnny Depp


Monday, 9 November 2026

Average Extra of: Russell Brand to serve at Minimum Roughly 7 Years in Prison by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Russell Brand to serve at Minimum Roughly 7 Years in Prison by AverageMansReviews

Warning: I will be discussing adult and dark themes with censored adult language references throughout.

Where to begin?: For the past few weeks I have been desperate to say one thing and now I can; for those that are under the age of 25 can you kindly shut the fudge up, because I have heard what some of you have had to say and man with your level of sanitized lifestyle we even find an excuse for Jimmy Savile not to see inside a prison cell if he was still alive today.

The fact is you know nothing; for those that grew up through the 2000s; knew of Brand’s raw sexual behaviour everywhere he went; TV, radio, movies and sold out stand up the comedian tours basically he did everything and under the BBC umbrella and Channel 4, he was allowed to get away with this manure; he was the pioneer behind  essentially; seduce, conquer and move on, there is  such word as no, because I can guarantee you in predominantly a males group of this time frame there was always one that went through women as if they were open doors [yes there is a tiny argument to be that this was the back then coming which is partly true, he just made it more acceptable kind of.]

I mean there was once when I have changed in 2014 when he gave an interview outside Number 10 Downing Street with the New Estate Protests in 2014, but I only thought that for like two minutes, because I could see behind his mask, he hadn't really changed here just sounded different way to feed his ego, and then again he did this roughly 10 years later in 2024 when he got baptized, which as a cynical old goat based on my opinion, this was nothing more than a strategic ceremony of events, because I have taken the time to view some of his religious content and it is just the same old Brand, just singing from a different script of horse manure; Brand  has always had this ego, so that weak minded people or people like him or people on his gravy train; like today it was suggested that he has made another 2 million followers on his social media accounts.

So we come on to today where he was handed a sentence of 10 years and six months; whereas of  here and now he will serve 7 years roughly and I'm just going to be honest and say I am absolutely delighted with that outcome, Because I have very strong views on any form of genuine sexual assault of any kind, allow me to give brand some advice throughout his imprisonment; don't drop the soap.

But what I am some less thrilled about; is we have the left and the right of our political spectrum including general public; taking their usual boring views which are both wrong in my opinion; Right; saying Brand is a victim; says his father; Ronald Brand Amongst other things, Meanwhile we have the left saying women can wear and drink whatever they like, which news flash both of these perspectives are so wrong.

Because you choose to be baptized that doesn't mean you are automatically given a clean slate depending on  what you have done you just can't wash it away, in religious terms you need to pay pennants for your sins or maybe Russell didn't read that religious text?

I challenge any politicism to spend one month with me to see how women of the modern generations truly act, because I am not condone and any form of sexual assault, but for you to keep going on and on about women can do whatever they like without any responsibility or accountability is in itself a part of the problem. these are genuine and honest account of situations I have learned from and these are just some; Because I am a nice guy I will give you an extra warning this is where fingers are going to get uncomfortable;

I went into college one day and my woman friend said that she had been sexually assaulted; by an individual that was at the other end of the cafeteria; In front of quite a few women including a woman that just did not have the ability to lie. So this alleged victim was telling us what happened, where there was drink involved and they had sex, so this individual came and sat down next to this woman he had intercourse with. I was furious for obvious reasons, so after a minute I discussed so you allegedly assaulted this woman? which he denied she got drunk she was willing, she denied in front of him that she dropped the words of sexual assault, so me being allowed mouth asked around all the women that had heard this story before this man had sat down, they all confirmed that she did in fact he used the words, these two that had sex where laughing at the fact I was Furious so I had to leave situation because I take this kind of thing very serious,

Or we have the situation online where I have had a quite a few women say that because I am disabled with limited finance I couldn't afford to  sexually assault them I had a feeling I knew what they were indicating but I got them to explain; playing the stupid card; so they went on to say As long as they  as they were over 6 foot with a massive penis and they massive  bank balance and lots of incoming money, the many questions could do whatever they wanted without any responsibilities as long as they bought  them he really expensive pair of shoes afterwards, so in conjunction with my disability I decided to play the dumb card and ask does that include sexual assault? usually I got back how stupid are you? of course that means that is included as well, but you don't have to worry about that as you are not entitled to access to me now fudge off!

Or I like to challenge the notion that we can wear and do whatever they like without any responsibilities or accountability, Because even though yes they have the right, it comes with responsibilities and ownership on the individual in questions, I have been myself when they have gone up to a man in question, with everything on so and they spend most of the night getting drinks  for free, now this does not entitle them to get any form of sexual release, it really should this notion down when the women have been going on about let's have one more drink and go back to a place for fun or something to them effect, 2 hours later man in question is now under the influence and quite heavy so, the woman has been grinding on his  penis for a long time and suddenly she gets up and disappears, meanwhile the drunk and frustrated individual is now incredibly angry, these women in question escape giving each other high five, having a cheap night comma laughing at the man's expense.

You see I know this to be true because I have given These types of women various mouthfuls, because it is very true I don't like any form of sexual assault, I hate morons of any gender that instigate this kind of behaviour, So I will now tell you a line I used to use with giving these women mouthful; You are aware that you have now primed that man to possibly go and engage in assaulting somebody else? Because I am not condoning it, but you have done everything in your power to wind him up so much?  their response being; it isn't our fault if he can't control himself, with my response being; so let me clarify this; you share no responsibility in; humiliating someone, taking them financially for a ride, stimulating so much that you were guaranteeing them sexual beliefs with the reinforcement of saying yes and then leaving them in a volatile state for the next person to do with the repercussions… and yet you feel no sense of responsibility or an element of accountability to this? absolutely not.

My overarching point to this content is very simple; until we get around a central table and talk about how to deal with this  despicable act known as any form of sexual assault we are never going to really move on as a society; Because as a gender yes males has such  cockroaches as Russell, but females have likes of  Bonnie Blue, so for example I would love that to be a law put in place where if a man had  sexually assaulted somebody; If it had transpired that he was with another lady previously and she had been found to being the instigator or at minimum a contributing factor to why he did what he did I want her to receive half of his sentence so if he gets five years she gets two and a half aggravated sexual assault.

But who my kidding; no one wants to get around the table and actually talk about current properly; where women can make allegations, so many can live in fear like myself, whilst the real victims already gender I have to wait years on years  for any sense of Justice so they can move on or try and move on with the rest of their lives such as in this case

 

 

Wicker 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Wicker 2026 by AverageMansReviews


Review Time

Warning:  there is animal cruelty/cutting/bodily functions/burning/ dismemberment/disfigurement/mental health/domestic violent/medical/there will be some adult language references in this content

The film is a manure hill on fire: briefly; we descend onto this village/community of years gone by;  where only consistent basis there is a marriage, so everyone is getting married; everyone but the Fisherwoman [Olivia Colman:] she is a good hard-working fisher woman, that has spent possibly anywhere north of the past two decades by herself and has become the butt of everyone's jokes, so she decides to go to this wick basket maker; the Basket Weaver [Peter Dinklage:] that somehow has the ability to bring something's he makes to life, so she gets him to make her a husband and the creation is called the Wicker Husband [Alexander Skarsgård:] he is a very loving, caring individual that is very good at manual labour

Generally speaking:  the storyline/script in conjunction with the character development are a dismal, as for most part there isn't much really happening, the character development really do quite annoying me, because on one hand; we have this woman will spends quite a few years on her own, being the laughing the stock of this community getting offers from drunk men at best, but when she finds somebody  at this point it is relevant that he was made for her; for now it is just about her not being that punch bag for jokes, because they are happy,  this community in one way or another for whatever reason are incredibly unhappy at their happiness, so they increase the pressure on them until something goes wrong, unfortunately I can identify with being the butt of everyone jokes and being single, including pressure from other sources to break up so you can pretty much guess I didn't exactly enjoy this being played out on the big screen. I should give you a friendly warning that this film is not  a comedy; it may have comedy elements in it; such as our lead partnership having  sexual intercourse, but the rest of it is quite crude; even by my standard.

The framework and pacing of this 104 minutes movie is…  Well from an artistic perspective we have words in frames; something like from black-and-white movies without sound; which was an interesting way to section up the movie and to instill some class and glamour into the project, the pacing is what I can only describe as; slow and steady.

Art, character development, performances and voice performance; the locations, set designs, wardrobe and accessories and the wicker man; these are all of a high quality and details in particular the wicker man; having to get that all on every day must have been hard work and then take it off as well; the other wicker usage is a little bit weird and freaky for me. the character development, performances  and voice performance;  on all counts; if this is what they were going for they struck gold, but for me; with or without the framework and pasting being what it is; It just felt like everyone was fulfilling their character type role and everything else associated with that

This film receives: 2/10, this is poor;  full disclosure I missed a bit of this film due to go into the toilet, I still found it to be really naive and  immaturally stupid, yes it may have been set in years gone past, but but intensely are not it highlights a growing concern that human beings are having to look outside their own species for human contact and relations;possibly due to loneliness/other reasons, so in this film it was wicker in our world it is AI and computer technology, On top of that we have the old trope of men in this time frame or in the present day they won't be enough or they can never do enough, women will drop us in a second for what they think is a better offer and yes it didn't escape my notice that the female equivalent to the wicker man was made of harder material possibly to indicate that if she was human she had already been through some stuff already consequently and quite  possibly damage any man she was going to be with on some level so this film tries to save face by impling men are as bad as women; quite frankly this film is horse manure, it is always funny when it is at the males expense isn't it, I should also point out that the person I watched some content with that would this movie as well; was far from happy with this movie as well; I am paraphrasing here; but in a nutshell; What a pile of  manure! But then again this film does have some awards accredited to its name such as 2 Winners which includes but not limited to Woodstock Festival 2026 Best Editing Narrative Feature Sofi Marshall and 2 Nominees which also include but not limited to Melbourne International Film Festival 2026 Bright Horizons Award Alex Huston Fischer Eleanor Wilson

Sunday, 8 November 2026

The Power of Few 2013 [alternative name Bound] by AverageMansReviews

The Power of Few 2013 [alternative name Bound] by AverageMansReviews


Review Time

Warning: there is shooting/ drugs/ bodily functions/ burning/vehicle hit/vehicle crash/medical

Will this sequence of events ever finish: briefly we are in this community location and this is the short time in their lives, on  our travels we will meet two homeless guys; Doke and Brown [Christopher Walken and Jordan Prentice:] the first used to be a TV news anchor and the other has a height deficiency and is hungry because they have not eaten for days.

Generally speaking: the storyline/script in theory should have been something reliably good as it has been designed to focus on these characters within this location through this short time in comparison to the rest of the lives, meaning for an example it doesn't necessarily matter about what happened next, because we are meant to just focus on here and now and that is it; which is good because if I had to judge on the ending of this film; it is far from  great  in fact it would be highly irritating, but that would be irrelevant based on the  outlay  of this script. But in practice because these character types are quite dull in the majority like 99% I can pretty much take or leave these characters after a short amount of restart; so the framework and pasting of this 96 minutes film Is on one hand functional and it is more than comfortable to fulfil its purpose, whilst on the other hand man things do get monotonous quickly

Action; there is shooting and their vehicles getting destroyed and all of that kind of thing.

Character development and performances; Simply put the character development are  in theory solid versions of what they are, which in this  case it can be a blessing and a curse, because yes they are solid, but because we may see them multiple times from different this  that and the other; the novelty can quickly where off and likewise so can the performance;  on the whole minus one  the tedious nature of this title can quickly set in; Tione Johnson as Few: She is someone that  you will  come across plenty of times as she is the starting point of the different narrative; she is the only one that puts a positively excellent performance as she is going throughout her day and tries to get a lift in this car where she  says this beautiful speech and it is advice for the other two characters in the car.

This film receives: 2/10, This film is poor; just to go through this Narrative/prospective from different angles and respective regardless if the performance are mostly at best adequate or poor, this is nails on a chalk board to me, But then again this film does have an award accredited to its name in the form of 1 Winner Arpa International Film Festival 2013 Best Feature Best Feature Film Leone Marucci Roy Kurtluyan

 


Saturday, 7 November 2026

Bandit 2001 by AverageMansReviews

Bandit 2001 by AverageMansReviews


Review Time

Warning: there is flashing effects/colorful effects/ shooting/polyamory component/vehicle crash/vehicle hit/drugs/medical/reference to bodily functions  

Criminal At Large: briefly; Darill Miller [Brían F. O'Byrne:] he is the host of this TV program, but for now he is having to interview the Sleepover Bandits at his home; with consist of; Joe Blake and Terry Collins [Bruce Willis and Billy Bob Thornton:] they are two escaped convicts; Blake is more of the muscle while Collins is set in the mould of brains both have more to offer; this is their story and it involves Kate Wheeler [Cate Blanchett:]  she is stuck in a loveless/lifeless marriage And she wants to feel alive again

Generally speaking:  the storyline/script is okay, the framework; the outlay of it; does it absolutely no favours whatsoever; as we go from near the end to the interview, to the beginning of the film or just in case I have gotten this order wrong; something to this effect and it does happen time and again, until we get closer to the end of the movie and then it just runs as a normal movie; Should have done is give the interview at the beginning and consistently with voice over/storyteller throughout the movie without interrupting the flow of the film, because as things are this film [123 minutes long] is very slow and in the final section it does give a momentum, like the person I would some of this content with referenced they could have easily shorten that film by about 20 minutes to give it better pacing and I would agree with this statement that is for sure.

action, comedy and character development; near to the outset of this project this  mobile cement mixer gets hi-jacked, this is one of the big action sequences that this film has to offer; it is smoothly executed what with the comedy implication of Collins being a hypochondriac or if not a very unwell man

Character developments and performances; on both counts these character developments are reliably good versions of what this film needs them to be and the performances of this  cast are sold it good versions as well; but allow me to make this course to clear without Willis, Thornton or/and  Blanchett; which let's be honest with these three names they would have easily put  bottoms and seats, so yes they very much do so this project;  in fact I saw this copy of this movie in a  charity shop and based off these three names on top of  the DVD we purchased it; so it worked is what I am trying to indicate here.

This film receives: 4/10, this is mixed; after everything is said and done this film finds itself in this section of my marketing system; it Enough about it to be considered a paint by numbers outlay of what they were going for here, which was a crime comedy without much or any comedy in my opinion, and there are extra  scenes on the left-hand side of your screen; it has some awards accredited to its name such as 5 Winners which includes but not limited to Florida Film Critics Circle Awards 2002 FFCC Award Best Actor Billy Bob Thornton Shared with: The Man Who Wasn't There · Monster's Ball and Best Supporting Actress Cate Blanchett Shared with: The Man Who Cried · The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring · The Shipping News. 7 Nominees  which also include but not limited to; Golden Globes, USA 2002  Golden Globe Best Performance by an Actress in a Motion Picture - Comedy or Musical Cate Blanchett and Best Performance by an Actor in a Motion Picture - Comedy or Musical Billy Bob Thornton

Friday, 6 November 2026

Wildwood 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Wildwood 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: WildWood 2026: Parents Warning: The Problem - Spoiler Alarm! Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/11/average-extra-of-wildwood-2026-parents.html and Labyrinth 1986 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2018/03/labyrinth-1986-by-averagemansreviews_8.html


Review Time

Warning:  there is flashing effects/ colorful effects/ animal cruelty/ shooting/stabbing/cutting/robotics of some descriptions/ suicide/ transformation/animal biting/animal death/drugs/impaling/ medical/reference to the rainbow community/dark themes throughout and in my opinion not suitable for anyone under the age of 15

Impassable Woods: briefly; Prue McKeel [Voice by: Peyton Elizabeth Lee:] she is a young teenager that has to go and rescue her younger brother from this mystical world, Curtis Mehlberg [Voice by: Jacob Tremblay:] he is about I would say 12 years old, He is very much in nerdy individual, but he also finds himself on this adventure as well with her to begin with then they get separated

Generally speaking: the storyline/script it is something like the Labyrinth 1986 where the little brother gets taken and the older daughter has to go on this adventure; because of the stop-motion animation; there is always something to see and experience, so the framework and pasting of this 132 minutes film just has to keep things going and allow the visual representation do it magic.

Art, character development and action; like I just referenced because of the stop-motion  and animation which this project is entirely based on, the artist can put so much more detail throughout this project, so straight off the bat we get a more immersive experience as for an  example,  designed with individualism so  on travels we may see a dog trying to track down our lead  character in this mansion As she is trying to escape he is wearing  a leather coat, Oh yes  if it's so happens you are a child from the 70s or 80s  or possibly very early 90s We have animal characters that are animals obviously, but given human abilities like walking on two legs and talking,  but still  clean their bits and pieces the only way and they know how or do  what naturally come to them as animals.

The action sequences are full on for just two examples; Other than the mansion, We have escaping the cages where these group characters that don't trust two of them having to swing these characters and their cages in one objective and that is to free everyone here or of course we have this epic battle sequence where everything is on the line.

Character development and voice performances; the character development and voice performances; they are a good variety between a coming-of-age, grieving/a desperation to have a fulfilling life on more than one aspect and the consequences of these raw emotions that are being felt by these two different worlds; the entire cast of voice performances really do put a lot of gravitas in voice performances, really put across these difficult times and dealing with things as they progress, this entire cast of characters and voice performances have spot on chemistry and lay everything perfectly down for hopefully some of this characters to come back in the future

This film receives: 9/10, this film is excellent; they did a phenomenal job of bringing this project to life in all its glory; it is a really immersive experience and to be seen on the big screen or as big as you can find or have, I just had to take a little off for the  occasions where I was thinking this film is not a 12A certificate by any stretch of the imaginations and if you want to know anymore please go to the related  content section at the top; but back to here and now; I really would like to see a sequel, but based on current information as in on one hand they have the character development  as and  material to meet this into a trilogy, but financially as of this content being first dictated; the box of taking this are standing at roughly 53 million dollars with the budget of 100 million dollars, so it is going to have to do some real business to get there or/and get a positive result to give any hope to at least  one  further project,  there is extra bits and pieces in closing credits, this film also has 1 Winning  award to its name in the form of  Sitges - Catalonian International Film Festival 2026 Audience Award Grand People's Choice Award - SOFC Travis Knight