The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring 2001 by AverageMansReviews

The Lord of the Rings: The Fellowship of the Ring 2001 by AverageMansReviews

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/shooting/stabbing/impaling/burning/drugs/animal cruelty/dismemberment/creature creation/decomposing/drowning/disfigurement/medical

Review Time

The adventure begins: briefly; it is decided that The One Ring that is also named Ring of Power/Master-ring/other names has to be taken to Mount Doom and dropped inside. But Sauron and his forces are the ones mainly looking for the Ring, because with it he can control these other Rings consequently control the world, so it is up to Frodo Baggins [Elijah Wood:] he is a young hobbit from the Shire, that unfortunately inherits this Ring and consequently burden, Samwise Gamgee/Sam [Sean Astin:] he is also a hobbit from the Shire, that overhears this adventure brewing and makes a promise to essentially protect Mr Frodo. Gandalf the Grey [Ian McKellen:] he is a Istari wizard that is the magical member of the fellowship, yes this is who Sam promises, but we have more from the Shire, we have Peregrin/Pippin Took [Billy Boyd:] he is a hobbit and Frodo's cousin and Meriadoc Brandybuck/Merry [Dominic Monaghan:] he is a hobbit and a distant cousin of Frodo; these two now and again bring some comical relief sometimes at the most unwanted of times.

Generally speaking: the storyline/script simultaneous character developments; the storyline/script and character development instantaneously transport its audience from our world into Middle-Earth with this voice-over storyteller exposition character developments from Galadriel [Cate Blanchett:] she is an elf co-leader of Lothlórien alongside her husband Lord Celeborn [Marton Csokas:] he is an elf and I am going to be honest we see him I'm going to say extremely limited like once in this small sequence, but I'm going to cover my back by sticking with extremely limited just in case I have missed something. But I digress; she tells of how things came to be and consequently off the back of this; it sets off this film hitting the ground running; with its framework and pacing being 171 minutes; being upbeat as every minute is meticulously given time to breathe with will fluently excellent as it has to cover a multitude of gear changes for an example; something like peaceful and playful to dramatic and action packed or anything else at a drop of a hat or vice versa.

Art, comedy and action; now it is clear to see that yet again the immaculate attention to detail is with us throughout; be it set designs or the natural locations on our journey or costumes and accessories or the mystical characters or anything else really; they did a phenomenal flawless job of bringing this world to life throughout this trilogy; which in hindsight feeds back into the framework and pacing as we could have multiple characters in this film and in this trilogy at different points different locations and because everything just works smoothly either simultaneously or off one another it doesn't interrupt the flow of the film; we the audience just to get to enjoy these visual locations among many other aspects, components and elements and if you're wondering if the sound of time have taken effect? No if anything they are just getting better with age as they come across as more authentic and no disrespect to those that worked on any level of the artistic side of things; as the landscape of making films change with more up-to-date technology; if they are originally put in on making the film in question as these were they can easily stand the test of time and you get this kind of really excellent balance of ageing technology with authenticity which brings another layer to the artistic outlay on any level of its usage.

So for one example of the comedy would be when we have these two mischievous hobbits in Merry and Pippin or vice versa as they are messing around with these fireworks and for the action obviously I was going to make reference to this one-on-one mystical action sequence for an example; the Grey vs. Saruman the White [Christopher Lee:] he is a wizard The fallen head of the Istari Order and does the bidding of Sauron: we have this epic, but relatively short in its entirety, but still no less important once-in-a-lifetime opportunity and privilege to witness the Grey/McKellen vs. the White/Lee: go one-on-one in this wizards battle: you just have to see it to believe that it actually happened, but in all seriousness; epic one-on-one battle sequence.

Character developments, performances, motion capture and voice performance; at this precise moment they are all fresh clay on a potter’s wheel; yes they may and indeed cover the foundations levels of the character developments; but they also are ready to be moulded by the journey that lays before them over this film and the next two instalments; as throughout this film they all begin to experience things which person moulds them, such as Frodo/Wood is quite quickly understanding the mammoth responsibility which he is carrying as this Ring feeds on the goodness of its holder and replaces it with its own willing to dominate its holder; very much like a worm feasting on a fresh apple not yet picked, the performances reflect these characteristics perfectly as these characters/performances simultaneously grow into one another; in short these characters are these performers and these performers become his characters; they make them their very own, for the motion caption and voice performances likewise they mimic the cast as it relates to outstanding and spot on levels of perfection [as a reference to we get flawless exposition that really does set things up perfectly in one way or another.]

This film receives: 10/10, this film is top-notch entertainment; it just does so much, so much so it does the ground work for basically the next two instalments to work with/off, so obviously if you haven't seen this film yet? I'm really talking to the younger generations or at some point in the future the generations that weren't even born when this first hit our big screens; you definitely need to watch this film once in your lifetime that is sure, because if you don't you will miss out on an era of cinema history and an epic adventure; to be shared with the age-appropriate to begin with family experience. This film has quite a few awards to its name such as 126 Winners which include but not limited to Academy Awards, USA 2002 Oscars Best Cinematography Andrew Lesnie and Best Makeup Peter Owen Richard Taylor [altogether it has 4 winning Oscars to its name] and this film also has 127 Nominees to its name would also include but not limited to; remaining at this award ceremony/event Best Picture Peter Jackson Barrie M. Osborne Fran Walsh and Best Music, Original Song Enya Nicky Ryan Roma Ryan For the song "May It Be" [altogether this film has 9 Nominees to its name.]

 

Average Extra of: Ronda Rousey vs Gina Carano: International Embarrassment for Netflix on Saturday 16/05/2026 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Ronda Rousey vs Gina Carano: International Embarrassment for Netflix on Saturday 16/05/2026 by AverageMansReviews

Warning: there will be some censored adult language references

Well this was a unfunny joke wasn't it really?: But having said that, I do find it slightly funny that for the rest of eternity this will go down in history as the first time-ever that Netflix has tried to put on a UFC/MMA event/card and this was their main event, talk about leaving egg on Netflix's face, I myself do not watch this sport including this match theoretically speaking/meaning I essentially watched it online; social media platforms, but even I find it amazing that yet again Ronda Rousey is still able to shoot off her mouth about the UFC/MMA on various topics throughout her press conferences and yes I have seen that she has apparently apologised in some way or another.

But I think we all know where I am heading with this content/point don't worry?...

So you criticise the UFC for broadly speaking being in a terrible shape, so instead of getting back in the octagon and putting on a decent exhibition match and showing what the UFC should be; you and Gina Carano decide to do essentially what I Hollywood Hulk Hogan and the W CW World Heavyweight Kevin Nash did back in the day [WCW Monday Night Nitro: 04/01/1999:] where Hogan uses this now nicknamed the Fingerpoke of Death: where Nash dramatically falls on his back on the mat and Hogan covers him 1... 2... 3 to become the new WCW World Heavyweight Champion and then Nash quickly gets up to celebrate with Hogan: on a quick side note I didn't know until today that this incident had a catchy nickname.

But I digress I am not saying or indicating or implying or anything that this UFC match was scripted, on the contrary all I am saying is; this wrestling match back in the day was scripted, so what is the excuse for the UFC?

I mean shooting off your mouth, then treating this match as if there was a championship on the line and the outcome would consequently really change your life is one thing or I could be really harsh and say what is the point of putting on a good match when both competitors are about to make either just over $1 million or just over $2 million respectively, now I am not saying go out there and harm one another, but there has to be a medium between that and clearly performing daylight robbery with this match lasting no more than 18 seconds.

So I feel sorry and mightily urinated off for anyone that paid their hard earned money to go and see this match live in attendance and I have to say to finish off this content, I find it ever so slightly amusing that Rousey criticises the UFC and then pulls this absolute manure, she is at absolute hypocrite and just to clarify I have no love for TKO or WWE or UFC or specifically CEO Dana White; I am just putting out this content, to highlight that this historic or what should have been historic, turned out to be nothing more than a cash grab by everyone involved with ultimately yet again it is the average person/people paying the price.

Mortal Kombat II 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Mortal Kombat II 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Mortal Kombat 2021 Link   https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2025/12/mortal-kombat-2021-by-averagemansreviews.html , Average Extra of: Mortal Kombat 2021: Briefly Back at the Cinema in 2026 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/05/average-extra-of-mortal-kombat-2021.html and  Average Extra of: Mortal Kombat II | Official Trailer: My Reaction Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2025/12/average-extra-of-mortal-kombat-ii.html

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/shooting/stabbing/resurrections/squashing/disembowelment/decapitation/transformation/regeneration/disfigurement/medical/basically this film is very visual in one way or another

Review Time

The fight for Earthrealm continues: briefly; before that; our story begins many moons ago on Edenia; where they were in a very similar situation to Earth losing 9 Mortal Kombat tournaments; Shao Kahn [Martyn Ford:] he is the ruler of Outworld and on defeating Edenia's last champion: Desmond Chiam as King Jerrod; Kahn claims dominion over Edenia and everyone in it; including but not limited to Princess Kitana [Younger: Sophia Xu/Older: Adeline Rudolph:] the daughter of King Jerrod and now adopted daughter of Kahn. But don't worry Earthrealm has the mighty power of Johnny Cage [Younger: Indy Urban: Son/Older: Karl Urban: Father] in his younger days he had lots of potential to become one of the best martial artists in the world, but nowadays he is a washed-up action hero, that has a very good relationship with his bartender [Ed Boon: he is one of the co-creators alongside John Tobias of Mortal Kombat:] so Earthrealm is completely screwed then?

Generally speaking: the framework and pacing of this 116 minutes film moves with purpose and understanding that it knows what and where we are heading with enthusiasm throughout its entirety.

Art and action; now either individually or/and simultaneously it is fantastic; you can see or/and feel though high-quality of the artistic visions; set designs; for an example stage fatalities, resurrections, costumes and accessories and other things. Now before I continue I would like to state the obvious; that everyone is entitled to their opinion, I will give that two seconds to sink in... ... I can now carry on, with that being said I did hear some grumbling about the special effects broadly speaking looking let's just go with negative and are now seeing this film, can I just ask what the hell are you talking about?... Because if I know what I think you are talking about at worst you are being a dick or for the interest of being balanced any other body part you would like to put here instead of a dick, but I digress; or at best you are being extremely picky. Whatever the case may be, you haven't clearly noticed a certain trend of modern cinema and TV to a certain extent; meaning by and large the massive budgets for the vast majority of projects just isn't there anymore on a consistent basis, you still may get now and again large budgets but nothing compared to before the global pandemic and yes we may still get millions spent on TV programs, but if they don't perform on whatever platform they are on these days; they will quickly get cut even though by its fan base it was positive.

So let's look at one of the clearest possible example of everyone's discontent on a hypothetical scare of, because I don't know, but if I had to guess; this would be one; Portal stage within Outworld; where we have a Resurrections vs. Liu Kang [Ludi Lin:] he is one of Earthrealm's greatest warriors and protectors: I don't have any problems with this sequence of events it is highly engaging and spectacular, I have just realised I have just summed up every sequence in this sequel: but I digress; this one-on-one action sequence is awash with colour be it the stage itself or/and the attacks or anything else, and because of this by other people's prospective or opinions this may not be up to the highest standard.

But because I have been around films and TV shows for a very long time now I can tell you what they did and it is very simple; they can either make a sequence like this where everything is free-flowing in keeping up with the sequence of events and keeping within their budget of $80 million [which they have almost achieved this budget at the box office] or make something stick out; either the background or the performers performing including their special attacks or anything else really, so everything feels like a separate entity in this sequence and without a shadow of doubt balloon the budget to an astronomical budget, virtually guaranteeing a loss of money and potentially a loss of any further sequels/projects: so like I said everyone is entitled to their opinion, but all I am saying is; you may want to look at the bigger picture before shooting your mouth off, because as far as I'm concerned everything that has been shown in this film; landscapes or action sequence or others; they have all been designed with one main purpose to begin with and that is to give us a more immersive experience and they passed that with sometimes incredibly brutally graphic flawless victory.

Action, comedy and character developments; Cage has got himself stuck in this one-on-one battle now he has to just somehow get himself out of this situation; which he has no other choice but to act his way out, which yes absolutely this is lots of fun and consequently he makes a new ally; so I just have one little question which is a big thing and it is absolutely 110% a missed golden opportunity to perform Friendship and for those people that don't know; these are a series of fatalities; one for each character to show kindness/leniency and in this case Cage's is a signed autograph of himself; so all they had to do was have him hand this over and say hold onto this until I return or something to that effect.

Character developments and performances; simply put the newcomers perfectly slot in with returning cast; so we actually have a spot on blend between the newcomers of characters/performers and returning experienced characters/performers and not forgetting we also have individual growth as well, so everything is beautifully set up for the third instalment.

This film receives: 10/10, this film is top-notch entertainment; it clearly has so much to offer from beginning to end including for a little while individual ending credits changes, so obviously it must be seen at your local cinema or/and this is for later on after its cinema run, you must find the bigger screen you can get your hands on and watch it to really experience the full splendour and drawing of this movie.

As of this content being first created I am absolutely devastated that this sequel does not have one single accredited award to its name, sadly this film was in loving memory to somebody, but I can't find the name. But I am going to dedicate this content to the one and only; Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa 1950-2025; in every project I have seen him in, he always had this and deniable ability to just stand out head and shoulders and go head-to-head with his opposite; he has two legendary videogame live-action performances accredited to his name Mortal Kombat 1995 as Shang Tsung Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2017/08/mortal-kombat-1995-by-averagemansreviews.html and Tekken 2009 as Heihachi Mishima link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2017/12/tekken-200910-by-averagemansreviews_7.html: RIP Cary-Hiroyuki Tagawa: you may be gone but your journey throughout cinema will keep you alive for eternity.

 

Reactionary To The Wrestling News of: John Cena Major Announcement at WWE Backlash 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Reactionary To The Wrestling News of: John Cena Major Announcement at WWE Backlash 2026 by AverageMansReviews

Warning: there will be some censored adult language references in one way or another.

Pure and simple what the hell is this absolute manure?!: Is this really where the WWE are heading? Because I know AEW in one way or another put on a lot of tournaments: for an example Continental Classic or even TNA Bound for Glory Series, but at least they make sense. John Cena indicated something to the effect of ground changing or something like that and what a surprise via Cena the WWE yet again has failed to deliver.

I mean I had to watch this or many clips sometime ago to get this concept in my head; it is because I got it, but I don't get it, so what you're basically telling me is we have this tournament possibly for men and women on one night and regardless if they win or lose they could still become champion of the first-ever inaugural John Cena Classic; based on the WWE Universe's votes, which essentially is basically a populist vote really.

I mean Wow this is the dumbest idea I have ever heard from the WWE and I have been around wrestling since 1988, this whole concept is a complete waste of time, because the WWE are just going to go with who they want when the dust has settled and making extra money on the side of their fans pointless engagement, I knew or if you don't know there is one big insult that you never use in wrestling circles; because it is a massive insult; even slightly bigger than words fake, but in this situation it makes justifiable perfect sense to use it; this looks and smells of a carny trick; whatever money you pay to play the game; the game and the outcome is going to be rigged.

Yes I am fully aware that the WWE have already tried events with fan interaction with Taboo Tuesday and/or Cyber Sunday and they were of what I remember broadly speaking is extremely messy in their presentation and more importantly the complete waste of time, so we have already been down this road with the WWE I don't know what they expect to be different this?

I mean any promotion minus the WWE can run a tournament and because it has been given a level of seriousness in its construction and dealing with things such as for an example someone has to pull out due to injury or something to that effect; in a nutshell consequently their fan base or/and viewers take it seriously and regard it something generally look forward to if it comes back in the future, I mean for many decades the WWF/WWE took the WWE men's or women's 5-on-5 Elimination Tag Teams at WWE Survivor Series so seriously around Thanksgiving that this for many years became a tradition: so this shows that the WWF/WWE could do it if they put their mind to it and effort, now we have WWE Survivor Series WarGames that only mainly effects the main event picture on the men's side of things and on the women's is basically get everyone or something to that effect, so they are well and truly taken the shine off his once glorious stipulation.

So in conclusion I think this John Cena Classic is a steaming pile of garbage as a concept and not only that this event is going to be a steaming pile of donkey manure.

 

The Bourne Supremacy 2004 by AverageMansReviews

The Bourne Supremacy 2004 by AverageMansReviews

Previous instalment: The Bourne Identity 2002 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2025/10/the-bourne-identity-2002-by.html

Review Time

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/shooting/stabbing/terrorism is/strangling/torture/vehicle crash/suicide/medical/references to Russia

I told you to leave us alone: basically; Jason Bourne/other names [Matt Damon:] has come out of hiding, after the Treadstone program framed him for something he didn't do. Pamela Landy [Joan Allen:] she is the Deputy Director of the CIA that broadly speaking is interested in this entire situation with Bourne, the Treadstone program and this current situation

Generally speaking: the framework and pacing of this 108 minutes film is lively as it really has an identity to it

Action and art; in the beginning stages or somewhere around here; we have this underwater sequence of events; this is artistically excellently structured to put across what it puts across and for the other actions they are manic but also we do get something subtle Bourne/Damon likes to spy on people using his sight on his gun and telephone them to have a conversation, so it isn't all fast paced action, more action and more action.

Character developments and performances; we get to see and experience the growth of Bourne/Damon as without giving too much away; things have just got personal and remember all they had to do was leave him alone; so obviously we get more of a in-depth version of Bourne, I am not disrespecting the previous version not in the slightest. But all I am saying is quite clearly; evolution of this character is what we get in this sequel as Damon is allowed to implement more of what his action persona is going to be not only in this sequel but in other instalments of this franchise as well; surrounded by a very solid cast of characters and performers, that understand Bourne is a possibly massive threat, that in a nutshell they don't know what he is doing and if he makes mistakes, simply put; he doesn't make mistakes, so he clearly wants to be where he is but why?

This film receives: 8/10, this film is excellent; it just keeps things progressing at a good pace as it relates to this film franchise. This film also has some awards accredited to its name such as 5 Winners that includes but not limited to Empire Awards, UK 2005 Empire Award Best Film and Best Actor Matt Damon. 22 Nominees that also includes but not limited to from the same award ceremony/event Best British Director Paul Greengrass and Scene of the Year The Moscow car chase sequence.

 

Tootsie 1982 by AverageMansReviews

Tootsie 1982 by AverageMansReviews

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/transformation/rainbow community component/sexism/sexual harassment/medical/references to suicide

Review Time

Way before Mrs. Doubtfire and others we had Dorothy Michaels: briefly; we meet Michael Dorsey/Dorothy Michaels/other characters [Dustin Hoffman:] he is an performer that wants to work in any way possible, he even put on acting workshops and goes for any audition he can get including but not limited to theatre productions, but even his agent has to time, he has been blacklisted from Hollywood due to the fact broadly speaking he is difficult to work with; so he vows to get work and not only that, also finance and star in his friend's Theatre production. Jeff Slater [Bill Murray:] he is the romantic playwright, roommate of Dorsay/Michaels; he is very good at keeping secrets and will help him out from time to time. A little time later and with a little bit of luck Michaels finds herself on this highly successful soap opera called "Southwest General" it is a medical-based soap opera.

Generally speaking: the storyline/script is best suited to be seen there is a drama project over a comedy and don't get me wrong it does have some comedy throughout from time to time, but drama is at its heart. The framework and pacing of this 116 minutes is good; but this film comes from the times when they use an obvious a noticeable presence of background music to create emotions and/or/both pacing; I know this is fundamental filmmaking and it will always be used in the filmmaking, but for back then I am just pointing out the usage and volume of it and from beginning to end this film is a little bit dry in its presentation; but then again there is an argument that this was how things were back in the 1980's, so I don't want to be seen as someone picking on something that represent a particular time in history, so I'm not picking on it, I'm just pointing it out really.

Character developments, performances and comedy; the character developments are least good and well grounded versions of what they were going for as in everyday people living their lives whatever that may be and from out of nowhere this woman Michaels goes on to affect everyone she comes in contact with in some way or another; this is very much a cast performance regardless of the size of the role everyone makes contribute something so there is absolutely in this wonderfully genuine authentic chemistry between this cast; yes I did just saying this is very much a cast performance which yes this is true... absolutely true, but putting this to one side for a minute; Hoffman makes this role/roles look and feel fluently effortless as they are parts of the same person, just different amounts on mostly everything, for the younger generations the comedy can be dry, yet again this may or may not have something to do with its time in history as in decade of release or/and good-natured with this one example of Michael explaining everything to his agent; basically a sum up of his current situation up to this point in the movie and throughout his agent has questions.

This film receives: 9/10, this film is excellent; after everything is said and done I have decided to award additional marked, based on everything I have discussed in this content, for a little while there is an ongoing sequence underneath the closing credits and man it does have awards to its name such as 26 Winners which includes but not limited to Academy Awards, USA 1983 Oscars Best Actress in a Supporting Role Jessica Lange as Julie Nichols/other character: she is a main cast character not only in this film but also the soap opera. 31 Nominees which also includes but not limited to from the same award ceremony/event Best Actor in a Leading Role Dustin Hoffman [altogether this film has 9 Oscar Nominees to its name.]

 

Average Extra of: Premiership Problem: West Ham vs. Arsenal Match Robbery: 10/05/2026: Part 5 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Premiership Problem: West Ham vs. Arsenal Match Robbery: 10/05/2026: Part 5 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: Premiership Problem: West Ham vs. Arsenal Match Robbery: 10/05/2026: Part 4 [which will also contain all the other parts up to this point as well: Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2026/05/average-extra-of-premiership-problem_36.html

I have just realised: by looking at other people's content, what I have been hearing for the last almost 4 days has been mostly a hot steaming pile of garbage; this entire situation should have been relatively easy to clean up or clear up; originally I was under the impression that jocelyn for position as West Ham sent over the ball from their corner and then what happened with Arsenal's goalkeeper David Raya: was Phase 1 ; I come to realise it wasn't and yes I am now fully aware of the fouls from the Arsenal players on the West Ham players, I was aware of this beforehand, but I now have a clearer picture of the order of this incident/scenario.

The real Phase 1: is a foul on West Ham's Pablo by Leandro Trossard, so for all intents and purposes until this foul is cleared up it is almost irrelevant if Pablo has fouled the Arsenal goalkeeper. Where it is Trossard that begins this whole sequence of events by facing away from the football and has no intention of actually playing football: it is his intentional interference that causes the first foul, which then causes Pablo to foul/interfere with Raya and then you have Declan Rice fouling a West Ham player: I will say this one more time I know there broadly speaking more going on in this situation then I have put here.

But in my defence; I have put everything that we need to focus on in this scenario in the right political order and this is so important for the next section of this content and you will understand why I have simplified it.

So as another content creator pointed out; why in the VAR check discussion did they made reference to questionable tactics/behaviour by Trossard, but spend more time focusing on the foul on the Arsenal goalkeeper? And the follow-up question is and this is crucial; why didn't they not show the right order of events and just go to the foul on the goalkeeper consequently the referee Chris Kavanagh could be blasé about the Arsenal players because he doesn't actually see the full picture and in the right order; so how is he meant to make an informed decision, without seeing how things really went in the right order? Which based on this perspective, now makes him look as if he was hanged out to dry by his colleagues, don't get me wrong there is enough blame to go around here, but let's just say if I was him I would be taking off these colleagues from my Christmas card list that is for 100% certainty; which is now opening VAR to negligence really, because if we were to spend what two seconds thinking about it; the referendum question is meant to make a decision based on all and I will say that again ALL the information available to him or her or person at that time, but when he doesn't have all the information given to him which you should have then I feel quite comfortable suggesting it is negligence.

Because what they should have been discussing is firstly is it a penalty? Or do we allow the goal? And based on this conversation we say yes or no and then we move on to the following phases of play such as the foul on the Arsenal goalkeeper, discussion yes or no and move on.

As I said when I first started covering the story; they have made a right pig's ear of this entire situation, the more I find out about it, the more I just don't like how things are going down; when you have this level of incompetence over who could potentially win the premiership and who could be relegated; especially when you could be champions in Arsenal have been doing similar tactics on scoring goals may be double figures of attempts of using this method and far often than not getting away with it this entire season.

So hopefully there is an ongoing enquiry into how they are going to proceed for the rest of the season and what ruling has to be made, because regardless if Arsenal are champions or not throughout the rest of time, I will not see this Arsenal team for this season as champions, because like I said they deserve a massive asterix against this; as this is possibly the worst premiership season in premiership history ever and incidentally just for the record again my football team is not even in the premiership, but I do like my football and I will be saying this again/calling for it again VAR without question and 110% certainty needs to go before the beginning of next season, because a will tell you one last thing VAR is a detriment to football, because it has stolen enjoyment from the game and this is coming from somebody that some time ago his team was in league one, going through those dark days was so much more enjoyable than having VAR. 

I have seen him use in one way or another the world corruption how this whole entire situation has played out, with this ruling not being in effect for roughly somewhere between 18 months to 2 years, Arsenal scoring so many goals using this method and now a similar situation happening up in Scotland with Motherwell vs./and Celtic where in a nutshell Celtic won due to an award of a penalty 3-2 on Wednesday 13/05/2026: when it wasn't: VAR needs to go for sure: it is failing at its purpose, so why are we allowing it to be used in our world of football; when I hope people are starting to realise that, before VAR there was some kind of weird comfort in it just being down to human error to why a decision was made, but nowadays it is down somewhere between corruption and/laziness in either way VAR can be thrown in the nearest landfill site.