Access Denied 2026 by AverageMansReviews
Review Time
Warning/Disclaimer: there will be flashing effects/colourful
effects/rainbow community component/reference to bodily functions and there
will be slightly censored adult language references in this content. Disclaimer: I am not referring to a section of our society as cult I am just talking about how it looks and feels like in this project, but then again in the current world we live in I can't help it if some of you get triggered by what I say.
Well this is just
propaganda, rainbow community, virtual signalling, horse manure!: Briefly; we meet Martha [Josephina Hauler-Davies:] a 23-year-old
disabled individual [severe level of cerebral palsy;] that is a lesbian and she
takes us partly through a day of her life involving but not limited to going on
a date.
Generally speaking: the storyline/script is only 6 minutes long, but incredibly so
damaging to my community of disabled people and for those people that don't
know I have a severe level of cerebral palsy myself, so before I receive any
backlash; this is very much a case of I know what I am talking about, so if
you're going to come at me, make sure you have some idea of what you're talking
about at minimum, because I will probably hand your posterior to you on a
silver platter within about 2 minutes, I mean I could probably do it in 20
seconds; but I like to give people a sporting chance.
Firstly the whole concept of waking up in this manner of everything is
going to be okay today is just a false narrative, when in reality and I do
stress in reality which this film seems to be placed in a fantasy world where
everyone's dumps come out like candy floss and being happy will get you through
every day and we can go to bed having a fulfilling life without too much
difficulty; other than worrying about if someone likes me, having access to a
venue or/and having problems with a sign that doesn't fully cater to your
specific inclusivity.
I mean wow if these were just my problems on a day-to-day basis maybe
I could produce a dump out of candy floss to; but from the age of 16 to as of
this content being first created in my 40s; dealing with bills, politics and
bureaucracy of this standard of life, rejection of any kind as it relates to my
disability, mental health - depression, lack of genitals size and/or literally
anything else.
Can I just say even in 2026 which trust me when I say 1986, 2026 or
any time in the future if you have assistant is required issues of any kind, it
is up to the disabled individual in question to telephone up way beforehand
or/and do some research on the place in question, basically don't be a complete
vagina head and just presume or/and even if they tell you on the phone
everything will be fine, until you have gone through the routine once presume
nothing.
The fact that she is 23 years old and finds this all the annoying...
is completely beyond me based on the grounds when I was 23 years old I was
already a seasoned veteran and somewhat she finds a rainbow sign offensive
because it says something to the effect of "We Stand Together" or
something to this sentiment, but what is important here is she doesn't like the
words "Stand." Because that doesn't fully include her; And? Seriously
And? At the age of 23 you might want to consider growing up if this is
problematic for you...
The fact that by the end of this propaganda piece of manure everything
works out right is nauseating really fudgin' nauseating, because it pains an
unrealistic reality on average of a disabled person's life, so much so that
throughout my life I have had to combat this false narrative of because someone
has a support network, that doesn't mean to say every disabled person has a
support network or/and a good one at that, so I had to deal with comments like;
but you have your family behind you. Wrong, but you have good friends behind you.
Wrong, but there is someone out there forever one, you just have to look.
Wrong. You have lots of money because of your disability. Wrong; in a nutshell
they give you enough money to survive and the more I think about it, the more I
think this project just reinforces stereotypes so that so-called normal people
can just use them as defence cliches, as to escape from a potentially
uncomfortable situation and avoid actually getting to know the real person
behind the disability or illness or other and maybe come to the realisation
that the public perception about disabled people broadly speaking having an
easy life on benefits is 100% false and those that push is narrative are in
essence financially gaining from the aspect of; if we take more benefits away from
the most vulnerable which in essence is much easier instead of going after the
wealthy, because we hold the purse strings of the benefits system and not
forgetting they can't fight back.
Character developments, performances and voice performances; in conjunction
with everything I have said so far; these character types are incredibly weak
in fact a pile of manure would be a much better description; yet again they are
highly unrealistic as everything has the order of even though things go wrong
in the end everything is alright; as you can probably guess this is the biggest
issue I have with this project, to the point where I am getting infuriated by
ignorance.
Because I have been disabled for 40+ years at this point and those of
a significant disability or illness or other would agree with me on some level
at minimum; there are two types of disabled or ill or others; there are those
that deliberately live in sheltered life or you have someone like me that lives
between two worlds the normal world and the disabled/others and yes there are
those that need to be protected from the real world for their own good.
But by and large as this film shows live in a sheltered life where
everything is safe and what I can see there are no major threats or
disagreements or anything to upset the fragile nature of this
landscape/mentality is a dangerous way to live a life as they don't learn
skills to deal with things or deal with any kind of negativity and/or someone
so forth so the whole character developments, I believe it to be highly
dangerous for this project to float the idea that for an example if I was a
member of the rainbow community on any on any level that I would be entitled to
this level of support and safety, which let’s call it for what it is shall we;
implications to coercive behaviour strategy;as in do you think the selection of
people would make this effort for anyone else outside of their community? Hell
no, so it kind of implies that join us and you will feel respected, heard and
wanted; if you wanted to make some elements of the rainbow community sound like
a cult; good job here, just the record I am saying it sound like it; I am not saying it is and finally the performances
and voice performances are poorly acted on any level or any form as well.
This film receives: 1/10, this film is poor; now the person I watch some of this content
also had the unfortunate mishap to see this project as well and as we are two
salty veterans as it comes to this lifestyle; they said and I am paraphrasing
here; that it was embarrassing and I just went with it was manure.
