Cleaner 2025 by AverageMansReviews

Cleaner 2025 by AverageMansReviews

Review Time

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/terrorism/torture/shooting/breaking/stabbing/domestic violence/child-abuse/environmental/animal cruelty/biting/suffocation/strangling/medical/references to cancer and sexual assault

Earth Revolution: briefly; this environmental group takeover this building and whomever is inside or at least most of them; Marcus Blake [Clive Owen:] he is the leader of this environmental/terrorist outfit, that one to hold these people to justice for what they have done, but someone didn't get the memo as Joanna "Joey" Locke [Younger: Poppy Townsend White/Older: Daisy Ridley:] she is a former SRR [Special Reconnaissance Regiment] working as a window cleaner; Michael Locke [Younger: Dudley Watts/Older: Matthew Tuck:] he is the older sibling to Joey, he is a high functioning autistic individual that gets on with computer technology very well as he knows how to hack them; I'm sure nothing unforeseen will have them?

Generally speaking: the script, framework and pacing of this 98 minutes film; how can I put this nicely? Don't get me wrong there are things happening in this film, but man, the script is this; yes on one hand it is functional and should have been something solid to work with, but it really does take this basic script, with the framework and pacing of a snail; to the point where you may as well skip the first hour and watch the last 38 minutes roughly, that way you might get some form of framework and pacing i.e. some get up and go to this project.

Comedy, action and art; there is some comedy moments Joey is in a rush or when she and her brother are in a rush in a nutshell it basically revolves around her not cursing and for the actions in itself; there isn't anything that really stands out; I mean if I had to pick some things; Joey going down the side of this location to begin her day washing some windows in this harness type of thing; this is good and it looks momentarily engaging. But for the rest of the time yes we do have physical combat, but this is the kind of solid standard okay it is doing its job; you know that kind of level.

Character developments and performances; they are solid character developments of what they want to be, but it has to be said that a vast majority of these characters are really unlikeable, the performances are... well if this is what they wanted, they got what they wanted, but for me on reflection they are really dull and without giving too much away, but enough to make this point; what was the point of having this well-established name in this title? And that is all I can say about it really.

This film receives: 1/10, this film is poor; as I have already alluded to in one way or another; this film doesn't really offer too much and when it does it isn't really anything special.