Average Extra of: Before I go and see Snow White 2025 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Before I go and see Snow White 2025 by AverageMansReviews

Related content:  Average Extra of: Snow White 2024 is sinking quicker than the Titanic Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2023/08/average-extra-of-snow-white-2024-is.html , Rammstein: Sonne Music Videos 2001 Link  https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2023/09/rammstein-sonne-music-videos-2001-by.html ,  Average Extra of: Snow White 2024: Peter Dinklage you have some explaining to do Link  https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2023/09/rammstein-sonne-music-videos-2001-by.html and then Average Extra of: Disney’s Snow White 2025: Official Teaser Trailer - Spoiler Alarm! Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2024/08/average-extra-of-disneys-snow-white.html

Warning: there will be censored adult language references,

Real Talking Time:

It is finally here: let's be brutally honest from the outset, the only way you would know that this film was going to be a complete cleansing of what Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs should have been is if you had been living under a rock for roughly the past 2 years. Because I would like to think most of us had a clear idea that this cleansing exercise was and is going to be a complete shower of manure. I mean as of Tuesday 25/03/2025 it currently has a 1.8/10 on IMDb and just under $89 million at the box office, from a budget of somewhere between $240-$270 million [I am just putting this out there: I don't know if this includes the extra expenditure to include these seven characters or not:] to be honest I don't care either way.

But it is a glorious sight to see these cinemas now being opened to a medium's gathering as all of these ghosts are sitting in these seats watching this movie or it is either that or the seats are just empty and surely that can't be the case? Because Disney wouldn't have wasted in essence almost $300 million on a project that was doomed to fail surely not? They wouldn't be that fudgin' stupid [for those that cannot pick up sarcasm; yes I am being sarcastic] and yes if you look around social media you will find people have taken footage of these empty cinema's as this film is playing.

I am aware that Rachel Ziegler is getting fired from other projects, be inside Disney or/and Marvel or/and other projects, my question is to Disney: putting it to one side for a minute that this film is stinking up the box office; why hasn't anyone considered suing Ziegler and before I continue yes she could countersue for breaking promises, but surely Disney would have a much stronger case. Going from the perspective of well between Ziegler and/or Gal Gadot: they went out of their way to create such a bad atmosphere around this movie [regardless if it is absolute manure or not, but probably is by the looks of it.] They were meant to be professionals and sell the film. But instead everyone knows they went and basically they individually took a shovel and bury this film; so if I was Disney I would sue Ziegler and Gadot for $200 million [$100 million each] and really don't give two dumplings what or if they are on the same page now or there is enough blame for both of them regardless of individually or/and a pairing [and if it is true Ziegler is for free Palestine, whilst no surprise Godot is for Israel and for those people that don't know is from Israel hence why I said no surprise.] But if this is the case; this absolute manure storm couldn't get any worse, but yet yes it can as Ziegler said that for Harris and if you don't unsubscribe, I don't want you and you will have never know peace; apparently; I have to say Ziegler is turning out to be such a nice woman isn't she? [Sarcasm here detected]

Now let me educate the younger generation for a minute; you see in life this is one of those situations where the money aspect may look ludicrous, but when you're dealing with such a big company as Disney there is something of equal importance instead of money and that is public perspective; so hypothetically and theoretically speaking if Disney were able to settle for something like $25 million if they were to bring forward a case or/and cases it would all be a case of public image and that is all what matters. Because as things stand at the moment both female performers got apparently paid $3 million each for this movie and based on public image it looks like Disney have got caught with their pants down, so if I was them I would recommend taking this action based on the possibility of some other performer or/and performers thinking above their station.

So yes as I have already indicated I have my ticket to go and see this film this week; do I think that Disney are going to learn from this situation? Probably not no. Why? Well case and point we already have a live-action Lilo & Stitch 2025 movie coming out literally just after this in a few months time 23/05/2025: it looks good, but not great, but with just a budget of $150 million: it should be a financial success, to somewhat balanced the books of this financial disaster piece. I mean I can't wait to see the next live-action adaption may be Oliver & Company 1988? How about Disney Gargoyles 1994 to 1996 3 Seasons: 78 episodes: which if you've never seen it all episodes are on Disney+: but here my warning: I would recommend a certificate of 12 A: based on this was back in the day when Disney actually tried to put out slightly mature content and broadly speaking it does have dark undertones which are not so undertone, but I digress; my point being here is clearly this; which one of the legendary back catalogue are they going to butcher next just for a quick buck; because at this point I think it is safe to assume not if but when they pull out the next iconic title to get at minimum a remake of some description, because that means they don't have to think too much.