Shutterspeed 2000 by AverageMansReviews
Review Time
Warning:
there is flashing effects/colourful
effects/medical/drugs/shooting/stabbing/torture/burning
All
over a camera: briefly the storyline is as
follows; Mark Pearson [Kris Pope] has in his possession this camera which has
something important on it and the bad guys want it back, but before he is
captured by them, he is able to drop it off at this police station, for in his
best friend to pick it up Seattle Detective Ripley Davis [Steve Borden a.k.a.
Sting; the professional wrestler and not the musician,] on Mark's death he is
seeking to bring these criminals to justice, even if that means working with Detective
Cliff Davies [David Lovgren] his younger brother which has recently transferred
in which between these two they share a dramatic historical event.
The pacing of this 87 minute film is good; this is one
of those films that does everything to a solidly good level, you know it
doesn't do anything wrong it is known as what it is doing and it sticks to what
it can and does offer.
The action and art; we do have some occasions of point
of perspective; meaning in this example Ripley is shooting at this vehicle
whilst he is chasing it on his motorcycle, the viewers get to see this from the
perspective of him pointing his gun and riding along with him, you will see his
foot on the bike that kind of short. We do get a little bit of variety with the
action sequences with as I have already pointed out a motorcycle or chopper is
being used and there is some good looking scenery. Moving on to the comedy;
because there isn't much of it I want to mention one very small moment I am
paraphrasing here; Ripley mentions he was on a sting and the comedy element is
the word sting; it is a reference to his wrestling name.
The character developments and the performances; they
are safe and reliable versions of their character types and the performances
are solidly good as well, but it does help Borden; he does put in a
enthusiastic performance as a detective that bends the rules and tries to get
results.
This
film receives: 6/10, this film is good; as my
marking would suggest it is good, I just wouldn't going with high expectations,
it is just a solidly good film.
No comments:
Post a Comment