Average Extra of: Assassination of Media Influencer Charlie Kirk: His Supporters are Hypocrites in 2025 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Assassination of Media Influencer Charlie Kirk: His Supporters are Hypocrites in 2025 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: Assassination of Media Influencer Charlie Kirk Aged 31 years old in 2025 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2025/09/average-extra-of-assassination-of-media.html and then Average Extra of: Assassination of Media Influencer Charlie Kirk Situation is So, So Dumb in 2025 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2025/09/average-extra-of-assassination-of-media_12.html

Warning: there will be censored adult language references and references to unpleasantness and I am going to give you the courtesy of telling you this will be uncomfortable for you to swallow.

Real Talking Time:

So where do we start?: Let me start by saying Kirk used his platform to amongst other things express his opinion, which in a nutshell he hit his beliefs in religious teachings or vice versa or otherwise such as speaking nicely or making someone else look stupid or etc, regardless of subject [unfortunately I have now seen some more of his content,] and I will give him some credit where it is due here is very articulate and he knows how to structure things to appeal to one individual on a one-to-one basis for multiple, but if you are cognitively quick like I am, you would understand he has more tricks than Houdini and I am not being arrogant here, but I am smart enough to know that if someone is this way inclined and smarter than I am, it is better to stay away from.

Can I just point out that feeling something is not and I repeat not knowing something; this is one of my biggest irritations, so the right feel angry at the left why?... Come on I have the time tell me why?... I can't hear you... Because the left celebrated Kirk's death. And? By your constitution that is the freedom of speech and they exercised it. Like you exercised it on 06/01/2021 when some of you were cheering on the riots at the Capitol building where guess what people died and to cover my back in one of them relating content links I have already indicated that I get it I understand why they celebrated, because in a nutshell if you had somebody causing a section of the society harm be it directly or indirectly day in and day out, they would probably feel a sense of relief not being harmed in any way by this individual or group again and I am also indicated a sense of calmness and decorum, so even though I understand it, I am also saying you know you might want to be maturer about the situation now.

So I watched this video clip basically praising Kirk where I put this comment underneath: Now he was not helping people: he was dividing people with his rhetoric end of story and then sometime later I received a comment such as this: Adam looks like a #diddler, which I responded with This is what I mean and have been stressing for days now: it seems to be perfectly acceptable for the right to be offensive or/and divide people, but they claim victimhood when one of them gets shot.

Two points: words have weight behind them so you may have the freedom of speech but you still have a responsibility and consequently consequences to deal with after they have left your mouth and secondly this is a wonderful example of what I mean I am not a sex offender, but it was perfectly fine for somebody to hide behind a computer screen and indicate that, because I am central/left leaning I have to put up with this kind of backlash and it just isn't in the US it goes for the UK as well.

Moving on; so why are the right deliberately getting people fired? I am not defending these people in fact if you look in this content I have been central about it, if it is good enough for one side, it should be good enough for the other. Then I see these people right going karma is basically coming for you and yes I am fully aware I have just spoken about responsibilities coming out of your mouth, but for those smart people out there, even though I have brain damage. My brain works on a higher cognitive understanding: in this case meaning this is a slippery slope and the funny thing is it actually goes against your constitutional right to a freedom of speech: so what are you now saying the country, that you can only have a freedom of speech if you agree with the majority and if you don't you are; you are silenced, which then it becomes enforced compliance or silence and for these celebrities ensuring Kirk's get an indication, so what are you going to do about the other children that either experienced shootings are you going to pay for their education to?