Pay-Per-View Rewind of: WWE Elimination Chamber 23/02/2014: Match 3/Part 3 by AverageMansReviews

Pay-Per-View Rewind of: WWE Elimination Chamber 23/02/2014: Match 3/Part 3 by AverageMansReviews

Match/Stipulation:  “No Days Off” Darren Young vs. Titus O'Neil: Singles Match

Match Attributes:

Match Quality: 5/10

Match Storyline: 5/10

Crowd Participation: 8/10

On Commentary: John "Bradshaw" Layfield, Michael Cole & Jerry Lawler 7/10

Satisfying Conclusion: 5/10

Recommend Watch: 5/10

Match Total: 35/60 - this match is mixed

Comments: simply put this match should have been put first on this Pay-Per-View; basically swap the Intercontinental Championship and this match around in its slots on the Card. But then again I understand why they put the Intercontinental Match on the first and that is to get butts out of their seats and engage with this Pay-Per-View from the outset [yes I'm aware I have just contradicted myself,] so to be brutally honest how the hell did this match find its way onto this Pay-Per-View it is just a TV programming match, but on a Pay-Per-View instead and that it. I mean why is O'Neill still under a WWE contract in 2021? Yes I had to research this; before I receive any complaints or negative feedback I am not calling for him to lose his job. But let's just say he would be one of the first names on my list if I had a choice between Zack Ryder or O'Neill for an example; as Zack Ryder every time and just in case someone wants come back at me with the African-American card, I know this happened ages ago before this pandemic but I would have kept Young, because I can see he was a solid worker and given the right gimmick and time; he could have been at least a solid Mid-Card or rotating between here or higher depending how things were going or now he could have been a member of The Hurt Business [If you want to know more please head over to the Spoiler Alarm Version.]