Allelujah 2022/2023 by AverageMansReviews
Review
Time
Warning: there
is bodily functions/drugs/medical
I was very conflicted about this film: in a nutshell we spend some time at this
hospital The Bethlehem Hospital, also known as "the Beth" and medical
facility is run by Sister Gilpin [Jennifer Saunders:] it isn't said but it is
safe to assume that she is a senior nurse, in a few days time she will be
getting a medal for her long service or something like that, yes she did say
the medal name but I have forgotten it and as you will see this is not the only
thing I have forgotten, but they are putting a little ceremony together to
celebrate this, but unfortunately this hospital could be closing down sometime
in the near future.
The framework and pacing of this 99 minutes film;
because at some point throughout this content I will be making reference to it
again in a different context, all I will say here is; it is well structured to
moves along at a good pace and to imply more than you think
Comedy: there
is a little bit of comedy here and there in the dialogue exchanges.
Generally speaking: I have chosen to do this content this way
because there is so much to discuss. I get the meaning of this film is meant to
highlight the ongoing problems with the NHS [National Health Service,] I
support it because without the NHS or/and it's surrounding departments and
other services I wouldn't be alive or able to live my life. I mean we have a
father and son at some point in this film; Joe Colman [David Bradley:] a
patient of this hospital and Colin Colman [Russell Tovey:] he does say in this
film his job title/roll but I have forgotten, but basically he is trying to
politically close this place down; talking about olden times like the picketing
lines in the sense of down the coal mines and modern times about in a nutshell
medical personnel wanting more money, where we basically have there are no more
picketing lines, but I was thinking yes we do essentially yes we do, we have
junior doctors and nurses, teachers and other people on strike.
I should just point out very quickly I have just
began with something relatively small in comparison to what else I have to say
so in no way shape or form am I clutching at straws here, as I have already
said I was thinking I would begin with something small.
Before I continue I would like to state this one
more time I support the NHS. But we come to this section of this film which absolutely
destroys this positive highlighting and it is where I am deliberately being
vague here a nurse is knowingly and willingly bringing harm to her patients
that are incredibly vulnerable. To the point where I watched this film with the
person I watched some of these films with and I said "I can't condone
this." In fact this person and I have spoken about this film at some
length today [when this content was being created] where I am paraphrasing
here; this person said it was a pleasant little film and I agreed with her. But
then we have what happened and then other name/Dr. Valentine [Bally Gill:] a
doctor and yes he does explain why he doesn't use his real name, right at the
beginning of this film, but I can't remember it.
But I digress as he and other medical people are
dealing with COVID-19 pandemic medically stripping off and breaking the fourth
wall to give us this monologue about the NHS, which the person and I
thought this was one step too far after discussing it. Because throughout this
film when this film is good it, it moves in feels like a genuine hospital so
let's just say the audience can very easily understand the subtext of what is being
said and what is happening and including Dr. Valentine narration from time to
time as well.
Because even before this downfall of this film I
was going to praise it for being a good film with lots of meaningful subtext
that put it out there, but allows the audience to pick up on it for themselves.
But for what happened; happened this film was going to get a comfortable 6/10
but I can't in all good consciousness give it now. I was originally going to
give this film 3/10, but whilst I was just about finished creating it, my brain
got thinking as I have already made reference to as this film uses subtext, I
am now thinking and this is just my opinion and speculation. With this
dangerous person being able to harm these vulnerable people is this film trying
to suggest that if the NHS was better funded there would be more staff to pick
up on this behaviour sooner and if so this is appalling.
Character developments and performances: from everyone in this cast they do a good job
especially Jennifer Saunders as the person I watched this film with said I am
paraphrasing she leads this cast very well indeed.
This film receives: 1/10, this film is poor; the person I watched
this film with would know and back me up here and say I was very conflicted
about this film; on one hand I get and support what they were trying to do and
say here. On the other hand I refuse to overlook a section of this film and
this monologue especially when I know who it was aimed for and I'm guessing/my
speculating here again it was for the politicians. But at no point in this
monologue does he give respect to the ones that support the NHS from any
background or/and without getting too political, but this is a fair point
nonetheless they told us in 2016 that Brext would mean so much more money for
the NHS, to support our NHS; so why is our NHS and surrounding services
including one example any form of incoming care on its knees?
No comments:
Post a Comment