Review Time: this film is mixed.
Fundamental elements: there are
voice-over elements, numbers and words on screen, cultural elements, mental
imagery, quick moving effects, no subtitles when another language is being
used, place jumps and time jumps.
The
movement; I was thinking I should come back and point this out, now when I
looked up this title, I found out it is roughly 132 minutes long and on
reflection I think this is the only problem, meaning everything else is the
standard for this kind of film [action/politics based] and don't get me wrong
somewhere towards the later stages it does pick up, but other than that it does
tend to drift along
Back stories/Storyline: the viewers get
shown in one via mental imagery and told of another via a news report, the back
stories and the storyline is straightforward.
Action sequences/Artistic visions: on both counts these two elements gives this project something to see
or experience, be it this transference
sequence between this aircraft to this plane [even though this aircraft gets
called an airplane, I am going to say it is aircraft, because of its design and
technical capabilities] or how these characters/performers go around inside
this plane without being seen for 85% of the time, yes there are weapons being
used, combat and other actions sequences. Moving on to the artistic visions,
putting these weapons together, the sky sequences are full of colour; they are
easy to notice including the flying aircraft of any type in them or looking
through any aircraft sight or that kind of technical bits and pieces, including
this bomb or looking through these infrared goggles.
Comedy level: there are comedy elements in
the dialogue exchanges
Character developments/Performances: the character developments are something safe and reliable, what you
see is what you get and something similar can be said about the performances as
well; from the perspective of they are just doing their job, there is chemistry
and friction [depending where you are is; depending what you get.] But I didn't
find it useful when one character/performer was making a small comment to
another character/performer quietly, whilst another character/performer was
giving this monologue of useful information [I would have preferred this
monologue was given the full focal point, I know this very tiny comment has a
small piece of value, but still I would have preferred this monologue to been
given the full focal point and this small piece of dialogue said in passing
comment quietly or something to this effect.
This film receives: 4/10, yes I originally went for a different
mark, but on reflection I didn't feel too comfortable with it, just because as
you can see mostly throughout this review there are bits and pieces to work
with or they are solid when it comes to watching this title.
No comments:
Post a Comment