Review Time: this title is poor.
Fundamental elements: there is a word or words and numbers on screen, previous events
happening in the opening credits [like little flashback things,] this moving
effect [something like in this case we have the lead character walking towards
this vehicle, but his movements for an rough example like this; take a picture
he moves closer to the vehicle, take another picture he moves closer to the
vehicle and so on,] I think there is a different style of quick moving effects
as well [but I could be wrong about this.]
But let's
continue slow-motion effects, voice-over elements, background music, cultural
elements, with and without subtitles being used, mental imagery, this
fast-forward thing, place jumps and time jumps.
Now I should
just point out a couple of things, if I have missed out anything major or I
have gotten anything wrong I apologize, but the general movement of this
project is very poor, because it goes here and there time jumps or place jumps
or anything it wants to do [I really lost my interest in this project quite
quickly, okay without making any excuses when this review goes out the weather
has been uncomfortably hot, so my interest may or may not have lasted longer if
it was slightly cooler or I had a choice between this title and an title, in fact
I have many upon many titles to pick from, but in a nutshell I knew I liked the
other one.]
I have no
problem with admitting that this title is and was such a chore to watch, yes
throughout this review you will see that this title has patches of being
something I can work with [this was the best way I could think of putting
this.]
Action sequences/Performances: the action sequences give this title value, briefly they are of the execute
with highly deadly force varieties; there are of weapons being used, combat
sequences and training sequences. Moving on to the performances I think I am
going to have to say they are patchy, yes usually I would say something to the
effect of poor to mixed or something like this; but as it relates to this
project there are some moments where are poor to a mixed to being good, or
somewhere around here, but then again in the same scene or sequence that I have
just highlighted that has potential it could quickly go downhill as it relates
to its qualities, in the interest of fairness and balance yes likewise it could
go up in quality or stabilize at a standard within the same scene, it really
does depend where you are in this project.
This film receives: 2/10 I think this mark is just about right, what with the action
sequences, including some of these performances having these moments of I will
say potential either separately or together, I feel I should make one more
point before I finish this review, because it is a valid hypothetical point.
Now if this
film began in the past and rotated forward consistently through as these time
jumps and place jumps [as long as they are nothing too big,] would this project
and its performers get a better review from me. I would feel comfortable
suggesting somewhere between a high-ranking possibility to a yes, I base my
reasoning on; all these time jumps or place jumps it makes this film really
difficult to settle down with consequently jumping around in time and places
kind of makes it really difficult to build a connection with these characters
as well [yes I am aware that at some points in this film they give you
background information,] but I am talking about a consistent connection to
these characters which can only be built without too much information being
thrown at your audience or audiences in one go or information generally, so if
they did begin this film in the past the viewers could pick up this information
at sensible points and in smaller chunks as well which in turn is easier to
digest.
No comments:
Post a Comment