Average Extra of: Netflix Cuties 2020 The First Amendment
by AverageMansReviews
Real Talking Time:
Warning: I will
be discussing politics and making reference to three well-known groups in this
blog.
Well
I wasn't going to do this today but it came up on YouTube [this individual did
show his sources on screen as well] and can I just say yes I am not from the
United States of America so I had to go and look up The First Amendment which
is as follows "Provides that Congress make no law respecting an
establishment of religion or prohibiting its free exercise. It protects freedom
of speech, the press, assembly, and the right to petition the Government for a
redress of grievances."
In
hindsight I remember now what it was I just didn't know the word by word but
let's begin; this is speculation/an educated guess on my part so even though
this film is French which is not covered by this First Amendment Netflix
however is based on the grounds it is an American company and in turn making
its contents covered by The first Amendment, but from my perspective being
street-smart it is a very weak defence.
Because
it means that it glosses over the fact what the viewers see in this project and
just to cover my back; yes I have seen this film [you will find the link down
below.] If anything it stretches this First Amendment to its breaking point, as
far as I'm concerned we know these kind of things happen in this film, but to
show it in this film in the way it does is the clearest example of hypocrisy
and hypocritical I have ever seen in fact if dictionaries are still being
printed I want this example to be used as an example to define these words.I
mean the only good thing to come from this film is; I have to question why
these people are defending this film [let's be fair without mentioning the
negatives] or let's just say watching it consistently.
The
thing is; as I have said already in this blog I am street-smart, I have brought
this up again to make this incredibly valid point. If Netflix and this film are
not held accountable; I can see years down the line of another film of this
level of controversy coming down the pipeline and that project in question not
only using The First Amendment but this case in its defence in essence this
project will become a gateway for projects of this controversy and higher.
So
I will leave things on a bombshell; if we have such groups as #MeToo,
#BlackLivesMatter and #SpeakOut which are in short against heinous activities
against people, shouldn't we all be saying "No" to this film as well
using the same logic and understanding and for those that say "This is
just a film." That is the problem right there on one hand we are saying
this is not right as it relates to these three groups and what they
individually stand for, but on the other hand we are saying or using The First
Amendment to justify something which is equably heinous and is a social
commentary in other words is "A reflection of the real-world." Which
consequently makes it a real-world issue so it stands side by side with the
other three groups in this blog; in fact I have just remembered the following;
The Director Maïmouna Doucouré 'It's bold, it's feminist, but it's so important and necessary to create debate and try to find solutions, for me as an artist, for politicians and parents. It's a real issue.' So even by her own speech there she has acknowledged it is a real issue, so how is this film acceptable when these other individual groups are fighting for in a nutshell justice and equality when this project actively is exploiting children and as I have already made reference to in this blog; this film is hypocrisy and hypocritical so it has absolutely no moral high ground whatsoever, yes I have said there is a little bit of substance in this film, but that is about it and I am really hoping that this First Amendment defence doesn't hold up in this case.
Cuties 2020 [alternative name Mignonnes] Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2020/09/cuties-2020-alternative-name-mignonnes.html
No comments:
Post a Comment