Review Time: this title is poor
Fundamental elements: there are voice-over elements, cultural elements,
slow-motion effects, no subtitles when another language is being used,
background music, time jumps and place jumps.
The movement
of this project is so slow, it makes this film really hard work to watch.
Storyline: it is so dull, yes there may
be a little bit at the beginning and roughly in the section quarter things
happen, but for a large amount of it as I have already said it is so dull and
on top of that it leaves things on a question mark of "What happened next?"
Action sequences: briefly at first
there are weapons being used, combat and chasing. Now at the beginning section
of this title we have one of our lead role's looking down through this
instrument attempting to unlock this safe and much later on we have the same
lead role in a nutshell stealing this object I would say this section of this
project is good to be fair and balanced, but at the same time I need to point
out that my interest in this title at this point it had left the building.
Artistic visions: there are
music/singing elements in this project they are good of what we hear of them
Character developments: generally speaking
they are the standard for this kind of film. The performances are from an
overview perspective difficult to call, because minus one character/performer,
they range from poor to mixed but there is friction or chemistry between these
characters/performers at the same time at some points as well.
The one
character/performer that offers a higher standard would be Edward Norton as
these different characters he seems to be able to switch comfortably, quickly
and completely into these different characters, as one character he does create
friction, he does have a moment or seems of chemistry I would say this
character is not here to make friends, but as his other character he needs more
assistance and guidance and he does switch into another character for one scene
[I am having an educated guess here, because there were no subtitles and I
don't speak this language, but I think he was asking for directions or
something like this.]
Maybe if
this film was quicker in any way shape or form it wouldn't have left most of
these performances exposed, [this is just speculation] I have to say maybe
simply based on the fact we don't know how this film would have turned out if
it was quicker but then again I am just working on what is in front of me at
this time, so in theory maybe if this film was quicker it would have gave me a
lot less time to pick up things or get bored.
This film receives: 2/10, no way
should this film have been roughly speaking 124 minutes long, straight off the
bat they could have easily taken off somewhere between 24 minutes to 34 minutes
just to give this project a sense of get up and go. Because as this film is [or
you may have got the hint,] that this film has no life to it [minus a little
bit at the beginning and until roughly the final section.] I mean I could
justify a slightly higher mark, but it is never a good sign where I had got to
the point where I just wanted this film to end so I went for this mark.
No comments:
Post a Comment