Review Time: this sequel is poor.
Fundamental elements: there is a word or words on screen, voice-over elements, background
music, cultural elements, mental imagery, yes and no to subtitles being used
when another language is being used, slow-motion effects, time jumps and place
jumps.
Action sequences: there are weapons being used, combat elements, an training element
and chasing element.
Performances: generally speaking they are mostly poor, I say mostly poor because I
don't feel comfortable labeling one character/performer's performance as poor
because in a nutshell this performance is far from poor let's put it this way, when
he is on screen the viewers should be able to feel or understand this character
is either going to do something or doing something or basically giving this
sequel something of a positive for me to talk about and let's be fair what was
given to him in this sequel he does a good job, what I mean by this would be
this; his appearance is not full-time in this sequel, but maybe in another
sequel I am hoping they use this character/performer full-time or something
like this.
This film receives: 2/10, I don't know what to say really because just off the top of my
head, if I am wrong about this I will change it when I see this film, but I
would greatly prefer watching Fortress 2/Fortress 2: Re-Entry 2000 over this
sequel, I mean there are two similarities between these two sequels such as the
escaping and the computer elements, but what I remember of Fortress 2/Fortress
2: Re-Entry 2000, I'm just going to be straight to the point here; it's much
better than this sequel.
No comments:
Post a Comment