Tuesday, 3 December 2024

Marvel The Punisher [Season 1,] Episode 2: Two Dead Men by AverageMansReviews

Marvel The Punisher [Season 1,] Episode 2: Two Dead Men by AverageMansReviews

Review Time:

5 things about this episode

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/other effects/shooting/torture/vehicle crash/cutting/breaking/dismemberment/medical

Two dead men and one familiar face: Storyline, Character [Character developments,] Action and Comedy; Castle/Castiglione/The Punisher would like to find out more about this individual, so he turns to someone he knows to get to the bottom of it.

Later on;

We have this fight sequence with another individual vs. Castle/Castiglione/The Punisher with simultaneously the song track “Ain't That a Kick in the Head" by Dean Martin [release in 1960 and 2006] to give this serious action sequence is a sprinkling of comedy tone.

This episode receives: 8/10, this episode is excellent; it just keeps things nicely in developing as we go along.

 

Monday, 2 December 2024

Average Extra of: Greg Wallace of Inappropriate Behaviour on BBC's Masterchef 2024 by AverageMansReviews

Average Extra of: Greg Wallace of Inappropriate Behaviour on BBC's Masterchef 2024 by AverageMansReviews

Related content: Average Extra of: Huw Edwards gets handed a six-month suspended prison sentence for handling under age material in 2024 Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2024/09/average-extra-of-huw-edwards-gets.html and then Average Extra of: Philip Schofield Returns to TV on Channel 5, next Monday 30/09/2024: Schofield Cast Away Link https://averagemansreviews2017.blogspot.com/2024/09/average-extra-of-philip-schofield.html

Warning & Disclaimer: this should be absolutely no surprise but I have to point it out, I will be using softer adapted language and the disclaimer is as follows I have no affiliation with Greg Wallace, so I am defending the ideal of him and if you're wondering should he be removed from Masterchef absolutely not, did he get a warning for his language? Did he get a second warning for his language? Did get a final warning for his language? If all of these questions are a no. [Additional: I am paraphrasing here: it has now been indicated by John Mai: a former producer of Masterchef that he knows Wallace had received a 90 minute dress style discussion with a TV executive, that goes on to say he should have been given one last warning and then essentially out he goes, then he goes on to praise the BBC for investigating Wallace, but rightly so Mike Graham from Talk TV points out why? Mai goes on that it was the BBC investigating and putting the evidence together against the BBC/Wallace and then Graham points out just a little fact that we are looking at 7 years later and then they go on to talk about I feel comfortable using the word alleged that Wallace apparently put a sock on his genitalia and ran around with it on.]

I has to be honest I smell the odour of scapegoat as the number of contestants is comfortably in the tens at this moment in time, I don't buy that women are vulnerable human beings as you will see in this content, so allow me to make this crystal clear I am not for Wallace or against Wallace, one of my biggest strengths as an individual is logic and being streetsmart and if you're wondering on top of that I don't like the BBC so I have no love for them in the slightest, in fact I would like to see it be gone, so as you can clearly see/read by this my opinions are my own and finally this is going to be very uncomfortable for some to read you have been warned.

So let's get down to business: the fact is these allegations are years and years old, [Additional in some cases they are going back 17 years] and yes I have seen some of his let's just call it risky material and what the problem? I mean if you have a problem with it says something then and there or maybe go to the people above him or better yet get a thicker skin, you want it equality and I am sick to death of people saying they want equality without actually really thinking what that actually means and for someone that has brain damage I can understand what this word actually means: in simple language it means; that if you want to be seen as an equal you take all of the positives and this is what most people don't seem to understand you have to take the fudgin' negatives as well, you cannot and I'm getting so fed up of this; you cannot pick and choose what you fudgin' want when you want it? Now if you feel or think I'm being unreasonable, whomever I'm making these allegations if at the time you felt that strongly about this situation, it is very simple get up and you leave the show end of story job done I am not coming back thank you. But no you stayed and took it so, so grow some grapefruits find your backbone and get on with your life.

Why are you taking this so personally?: It is very simple every time, every time and I do mean every time this happens or some kind of movement happens be it; film or TV, politically or racially or anything else literally anything else; eventually it gets felt on the streets so let's say hypothetically and I do stress hypothetically it is acceptable for our politicians to be racial or prejudice or discriminating our general public will see this as acceptable for them to echo their opinions in any way shape or form they see fit. Yes just for the record I am fully aware that Downing Street has now got involved basically condemning Wallace's comments of women of a certain age which he himself has now apologised for they are now waiting for the BBC and what to do next as it relates to this saga and Masterchef? In a nutshell how about you fudgin' get on and concentrate on running the country?

So let me be really real shell we?! The uncomfortable reality is simple; as I made reference to earlier eventually everything gets felt on a street level, so let me tell you about the street level/online level shall I; to be brutally honest what I am about to say is 100% honest and I don't care if you don't like it; about two months ago I was going to watch a film with a family member and I turn my head to see this perhaps 10-year-old girl with these white very tight shorts on so obviously when she bent over I could see her butt cheeks and I looked at the parents and looked at my family member; this individual gave me that look to say I know. Then just yesterday I wheeled into a lift that had a family in it and on my left was no more than a 14-year-old girl with a top showing off her mid drift, which if I am in close proximity to a woman of any age I put my head down! Yes I literally put my head down looking at the floor so I cannot be accused of looking or groping or anything in fact it has just come to my attention that the person I went into this lift with had noticed that a shopping centre cleaner head noticed that I had put my head down.

Because if you are over 5 foot and because I am in a wheelchair if I was to put my head up or if you are over as I said 5 foot I would have to look up, which means I would be at the right height/parallel with your breasts or I would have to look past your breasts and it has been psychologically batted into my head on a quick side note I also have a mental health issue on top of that for an easy life I just don't look up on most cases there are some people I can put my head up with.

Yet again it has been psychologically beaten into my head that anything I say or do can be used against me or my penis can be used against me such as dealing with comments such as you may sexually assault me? Which I find incredibly insulting considering my body due to my disability is way too damaged to actually enforce this behaviour, yes absolutely I have said I wish I had that ability then I would put it to better use such as go and play football or American football than being confined to a wheelchair for the rest of my life.

Not only this; I also have to put up online chat rooms of an adult nature; why don't you go and commit suicide or your genitalia is small, so I have to put up with bodies shaming but as soon as I flip it around they don't like it, why don't I pay for sex? Because the last time I looked it is illegal, I don't if I am ever lucky again to be in a relationship wanting to explain that to the individual in question, surprise surprise the comment I usually get back is I don't have to tell them. Well that is stupid, building a relationship on a major lie is wrong and then on top of that I get going to take my baggage out on me from a woman's perspective, but then again I pointed out that it is seemingly okay for the woman in question to do it to me. Which are usually come out with; well okay so lets get this right it is more than acceptable for you to punish me because of my gender, but then again it is not okay for me to punish you for your gender or species?

This is where I usually get called a misogynist and so on and so forth and just for the record I wouldn't take it out on someone new, but I would gently discuss it over time that I would really like to for one example like to hug you, but because of the world we are living in mixed in with my depression I physically find it difficult to start anything, because of possible misconduct allegations that may or may not happen in the future, if you think I'm making this up there are some people I do touch quickly followed by apologising if I have caused any offence.

I mean I have had women I know of that have found it funny for me to get encouraged to hug them or touch them in a non-sexual way and drop the R word as I quickly in fear and this was when I was at college in my teens newsflash am now in my 40's on top of that I have had severe No's in my life, I'm not talking about a woman's right to say no, all I am saying is saying no nicely like not tonight, but good try, which from that I would get not tonight but good on you for trying. Because I have been castrated in one way or another with women to the point where I have been humiliated for an example; I was at a family dinner party which the woman I was seeing many years ago indicated to me; that lets go to this dinner party and go home and have some sex; by this point I was having physical problems but to make sure my physical problems or worse, it was getting late so I was indicating may be twice, because remember I don't have the confidence so whatever confidence I have, I really have to push myself and from out of nowhere she shouted I have to do most of the work anyway or something in that ballpark and whatever courage or sex drive I had that night went down the toilet and incidentally I would have done more if I had any self-esteem or you know maybe she didn't have to shove my physical disability in my face as a family dinner.

But then again let's briefly talk about the elephant in the room; generally speaking women don't believe in male mental health so I may as well be speaking double dutch, which as you can see/read it is a very real illness.

My point being for telling you all this; firstly I know this would never happen, but if you want to use equality as a starting point; bring out a public fine that says any minor from 0-10 years old that is caught being inappropriately dressed £250 and from 10-16 £400, I mean you could even call the act protecting children. The notion that people can do whatever they like is basically and I can say this because I am but I also get called it a spastic or cripple notion to say at the very least. Because with that ideology a 15-year-old that comes up and talks to me with provocative clothing on, why should I be held responsible for how she looks when it should be her or her parents/guardians that should be held responsible and yes I have had on average maybe three a month situations where I end up talking to potentially teenagers and because I am a nice guy, I speak properly to them, but I also do the respectable thing of a quick exit approach.

If Wallace is just being verbal then it should have been dealt with at the time or within a month of the incident if these women were so afraid to come forward, but as I have clearly shown if this was happening to male contestants would the story have the same kind of traction? We all know that the answer would be no.

To finish off this content I am so glad that there are some already pointing out one key massive problem/fact and the fact are Huw Edwards and/or Phillip Schofield did much worse than Wallace, I am not saying that potentially two wrongs make a right here. But my point is when the previous two; clearly had at one point or another had means or contact with the under age content or child to begin with and both ended well one with a six-month suspended sentence with a very lucrative pension and the other with his own TV program and then we have Wallace which at best/worst may have been inappropriate.

I just think that if we are not careful that you may as well castrate all men into Ken, that way you can do whatever you like and we don't get blamed for anything, because for me personally and yet again this is true it has taken me 12 years to find enough bottle to give out my number to some ladies; I do it this way so that they can physically see the wheelchair and it is left up to them and if you're wondering no, I have had no texts back, but I have had 1 snotty message in return.

 

 

 

 

 

Marvel The Punisher [Season 1,] Episode 1: 3 AM by AverageMansReviews

Marvel The Punisher [Season 1,] Episode 1: 3 AM by AverageMansReviews

Just a heads up: these reviews/content for this TV show will work under the rules of between 3 to 5 things about this episode and I will censor these reviews/content, when I feel it is appropriate to do so or at the very least the best to my abilities.

Review Time:

5 things about this episode

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/other effects/dismemberment/shooting/strangling/squashing/burning/medical

A dead man is still walking: Character [Character developments,] Storyline, Action and Art; we meet Pete Castiglione/real identity Frank Castle/The Punisher as he is working on a building site, but regardless of the change of name trouble always seems to follow him as he takes care of this situation in the only way he knows how with brutal violence, this is where at some points in this action sequence we get the blood splatter cam [I am going to go with that description because that is what it is;] it is where in this case Castle/Castiglione/The Punisher is hitting someone so hard that their blood splatters onto the camera shot, to give a fully immersive experience.

This episode receives: 8/10, this episode is excellent; after everything is said and done this episode finds itself in this bracket of my marking system.

 

Sunday, 1 December 2024

Marvel The Defenders [Series 1,] Episode 8: The Defenders by AverageMansReviews

Marvel The Defenders [Series 1,] Episode 8: The Defenders by AverageMansReviews

Review Time:

5 things about this episode

Warning: this TV program is suitable for 15 and up, there is flashing effects/colourful effects/other effects/shooting/cutting/impaling/strangling/dismemberment/medical

The Defenders vs. the Hand: Storyline, Action, Art and Character [Character developments;] well the time is finally here winner takes all the marbles as we have good vs. evil; as you would imagine this entire sequence of events is high octane action, being complemented by its presentation which is smooth and fun. Attorney Murdoch/Daredevil whisperers something to Rand/Iron Fist and says all be right behind you; he just needs to go and sort something out first.

This episode receives: 9/10, this episode is excellent; it is an excellent conclusion to this TV program and it has some awards accredited to its name such as 9 Nominees that includes Academy of Science Fiction, Fantasy & Horror Films, USA 2018 Saturn Award Best New Media Superhero Series, Primetime Emmy Awards 2018 Primetime Emmy Outstanding Original Main Title Theme Music John Paesano and Online Film & Television Association 2018 FTA Television Award Best New Theme Song in a Series

 

Marvel The Defenders [Series 1,] Episode 7: Fish in the Jailhouse by AverageMansReviewsWell

Marvel The Defenders [Series 1,] Episode 7: Fish in the Jailhouse by AverageMansReviews

Review Time:

5 things about this episode

Warning: this TV program is suitable for 15 and up, there is flashing effects/colourful effects/other effects/torture/burning/reference to drugs.

Okay, let's talk about the elephant in the room: Storyline, Action, Art, Character [Character developments;] the Hand need this door open, Rand/Iron Fist has a one-on-one encounter with this individual; from an action or/and artistic perspective it is of a very high standard. Speaking of Rand/Iron Fist; we really need to talk about the elephant in the room as it is him; I think most of you that have seen this section of Netflix/Marvel Universe was hopefully agree that, this first version of Rand/Iron Fist is the weakest character in this universe by some [a lot] distance. Now full disclosure I know the loosely based facts about this character and even I know this version of this character is a whiny little child and as it relates to this TV series, it really does show throw a specially when he is discussing things with one or more or all of The Defenders; basically the other three members have individually or together gelled together as grown-ups, so even though they may or may not agree with one another, they deal with it as an adult. So as far as I am aware as of this content; the indication is that they want to bring back The Defenders; so with that being stated; they may want to rectify this glaringly obvious problem.

This episode receives: 8/10, this episode is excellent; it has built things up to the final episode of this version of this TV program.