Pay-Per-View Rewind of: WWE Elimination Chamber 2017 12/02/2017 Match 4 Part 4 by AverageMansReviews - Spoiler Alarm!

Pay-Per-View Rewind of: WWE Elimination Chamber 2017 12/02/2017 Match 4 Part 4 by AverageMansReviews - Spoiler Alarm!

Warning: there is flashing effects/colourful effects/adult language

Match/Stipulation:  Nikki Bella vs. “The Queen of the Black Hearts" Natalya: Singles Match

Match Attributes:

Match Quality: 4/10

Match Slot Storyline: 3/10

Crowd Participation: 5/10

On Commentary: Tom Phillips, John "Bradshaw" Layfield, Mauro Ranallo & David Otunga 6/10

Satisfying Conclusion: 1/10

Recommend Watch: 1/10

Match Total: 20/60 - this match/match slot is poor.

Comments: all I can say for him now is; what was the point of this match? I mean I mean if this is what they planned for this match slot? What a waste of time, in summary all it does is they have a little scuffle and it must continue after this event and that is it. I mean when we have Natalya: making a valid point of basically; if Natalya thinks she came out wrestle Bella then why doesn't you do it? Layfield says yes she is and she is winning.  Natalya: is winning, with Otunga saying she isn't, she is punching and kicking her.

Basic Result: Draw

Basic walk-through of this event:

* Tom Phillips: Commentary move things along to Carmella and James Elsworth appearing in a skybox handing things again over to

* Dasha Fuentes: interviewer asks Carmella and James Elsworth for their opinion on what they have just seen.

* The Wyatt Family's message: promo from Bray Wyatt and Randy Orton

* Tom Phillips: Commentary continues by talking about what is coming next simultaneously graphics of our next match Luke Harper vs. Randy Orton; moves on to video package of how we came to be in this situation.

* Greg Hamilton: Ring announcer saying stipulations and introducing our competitors.

* Mauro Ranallo & David Otunga: Commentary these two are discussing Luke Harper. But Ranallo makes it blooper by calling him David Harper. This is completely speculation on my part, but I have a feeling that Layfield picked up on this; so when he came into the conversation he deliberately said his name of Luke Harper, but on the other hand it does fit nicely into the conversation so it is purely based on speculation and previous knowledge of Layfield not giving Ranallo a break. Forget what I just said as we move slightly on Layfield deliberately drops dropped Luke or Luke Harper name in these two different ways. So you can pretty much take it as a subtle dig at Ranallo, but this is where I will leave things in this content.